Market Analysis — BRENTWOOD BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE
MS market | 6 hospitals | HHI: nan (Competitive)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
← DashboardPRFProfileMEMIC MemoBRGBridgeCIComp IntelSCNScenariosAIMLDCFDCFLBOLBOFIN3-StmtMKTMarketDENDenialRETReturnsLVRLeversWFLWaterfallPLYPlaybookTRDTrendsPREDPredictedMEM2Memo
6
Hospitals in Market
515
Total Beds
$0.2B
Market Revenue
Competitive
HHI: nan
None
Moat Rating (3/10)
#4
Market Share Rank
Competitive Moat (Mauboussin Framework)
Based on "Measuring the Moat" adapted for healthcare. Score 0-10: wide (8+), narrow (5-7), none (<5).
Scale Advantagemoderate
Switching Costsmoderate
Market Share11.0%
Top 3 Concentrationnan%
Network Density1.17
Margin vs Market-4.2%
Bed Util vs Market-14.0%
What This Means
This hospital has a none moat — no moat — commoditized market position, pricing power limited. The MS market is competitive — many players, value creation must come from operations not market power (HHI: nan).
Implications: Operational improvements are the primary value driver — see the EBITDA bridge. Compare against peers via comparables or see the full MS market.
Top Competitors
| Hospital | Beds | Revenue | Rev Share | Bed Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CROSSGATES RIVER OAKS HOSPITAL | 86 | $40M | 18.5% | 16.7% |
| WHITFIELD MEDICAL SURGICAL CENTER | 32 | $nanM | nan% | 6.2% |
| RIVER OAKS HOSPITAL | 158 | $124M | 56.9% | 30.7% |
| MERIT HEALTH WOMANS HOSPITAL | 34 | $30M | 13.6% | 6.6% |
| MSH- RECEIVING UNITS | 100 | $nanM | nan% | 19.4% |
Regional Payer Mix
■ Medicare 19%■ Medicaid 32%■ Commercial 50%