Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BRENTWOOD BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BRENTWOOD BEHAVIORAL HEALTHCARE
CCN 254007 | MS | 105 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.1M → Pro Forma $140K (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$23.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$140K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$918K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$841K
Risk-Adjusted
-$419K
Execution Discount
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.8M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$479K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$474K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$291K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$15K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$479K$479K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$461K$13K$474K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$73K$218K$291K$918K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$15K$15K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$120K$239K$359K$479K$479K$479K$479K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$119K$237K$356K$474K$474K$474K$474K
A/R Days Reduction$0$97K$194K$291K$291K$291K$291K$291K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K$15K
Cumulative$0$343K$686K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-67.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
74.4x
Headroom (turns)
1144%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1144% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -67.9x, adding 166.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.1M$-1.1M-4.7%
Year 1$-1.2M+$840K$-314K-1.3%
Year 2$-1.2M+$1.3M$71K0.3%
Year 3$-1.2M+$1.3M$36K0.1%
Year 4$-1.3M+$1.3M$-919-0.0%
Year 5$-1.3M+$1.3M$-39K-0.2%
$-11.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$-426K
Exit EV (11x)
$10.8M
Value Created
$-39K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.8M
Organic Growth
$12.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-39K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$239K$359K$479K$575K
Denial Rate Reductio$237K$356K$474K$569K
A/R Days Reduction$146K$219K$291K$350K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$11K$15K$18K
Total$630K$945K$1.3M$1.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 27 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-4.7%-15.2%-4.0%3.1%
P38
Net-to-Gross62.4%9.9%21.1%30.3%
P96
Occupancy48.0%24.6%40.9%54.5%
P63
Rev/Bed$228K$464K$643K$1.1M
P8
Exp/Bed$239K$389K$671K$1.1M
P15

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML