Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — MOAB REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:04 UTC
IC Memo — MOAB REGIONAL HOSPITAL
Investment Committee Memorandum | UT | 17 beds | Grade C | EBITDA uplift $3.3M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

MOAB REGIONAL HOSPITAL

CCN 461302 | GRAND, UT | 17 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
C
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

MOAB REGIONAL HOSPITAL is a 17-bed rural/critical access in GRAND, UT with $44.2M in net patient revenue and a -3.4% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 57.2% Medicare, 12.4% Medicaid, and 30.4% commercial.

Thesis: Turnaround. Our ML models identify $3.3M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from -3.4% to 4.0% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$44.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$-1.5M
Operating Margin COMPUTED-3.4%
Occupancy HCRIS31.8%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$2.6M
Net-to-Gross HCRIS57.7%
Distress Probability ML56.4%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

59
UT Hospitals
8.0%
State Median Margin
19
Comparable Hospitals

UT has 59 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of 8.0%. The target's margin of -3.4% places it below the state median. Among 19 size-comparable peers (8-34 beds), the median margin is 0.5%. The target's below-peer margin suggests operational improvement opportunity.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (8-34), prioritizing same-state peers. 19 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
MOAB REGIONAL HOSPITAL (Target)UT17$44.2M-3.4%
GUNNISON VALLEY HOSPITALUT25$130.4M-6.4%
UINTAH BASIN MEDICAL CENTERUT33$119.9M1.8%
SPANISH FORK HOSPITALUT16$65.3M0.5%
CENTRAL VALLEY MEDICAL CENTERUT25$60.7M4.3%
SEVIER VALLEY HOSPITALUT24$58.2M14.5%
HEBER VALLEY HOSPITALUT19$55.8M8.4%
CACHE VALLEY HOSPITALUT28$34.7M-12.4%
OREM COMMUNITY HOSPITALUT24$34.2M4.9%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $3.3M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$928K+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$884K+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$875K+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$538K+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$28K+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$928K
Cost to Collect
$884K
Denial Rate Reduction
$875K
A/R Days Reduction
$538K
Clean Claim Rate
$28K
Total EBITDA Uplift$3.3M
Current EBITDA$-1.5M
+ RCM Uplift+$3.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA$1.8M
Current Margin-3.4%
Pro Forma Margin4.0%
WC Released (1x)$1.7M

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$-2.3M$22.7M0.00x-100.0%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$-2.3M$24.3M0.00x-100.0%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$-2.1M$34.2M0.00x-100.0%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$-2.1M$36.8M0.00x-100.0%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$-2.5M$7.2M0.00x-100.0%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$-2.5M$7.1M0.00x-100.0%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
HighNegative operating marginRCM uplift bridge shows clear path to profitability; working capital release provides near-term cash cushion
MediumHeavy Medicare dependenceMedicare comprises 57.2% of days; rate updates may lag inflation. Mitigant: CDI/CMI lever directly increases Medicare reimbursement
MediumLow occupancyAt 31.8%, fixed costs are spread over fewer patient days. Mitigant: volume growth is an additional upside lever not modeled in base case
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 56.4% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 19 hospitals with 8-34 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=20)
  • Comp margins: P25=-10.3% / P50=0.5% / P75=5.1%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.