Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MOAB REGIONAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MOAB REGIONAL HOSPITAL
CCN 461302 | UT | 17 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.5M → Pro Forma $840K (+$2.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$44.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$840K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$2.3M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$790K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$884K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$875K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$538K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$28K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$884K$884K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$850K$24K$875K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$136K$402K$538K$1.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$28K$28K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT69.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$221K$442K$663K$884K$884K$884K$884K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$219K$437K$656K$875K$875K$875K$875K
A/R Days Reduction$0$179K$358K$538K$538K$538K$538K$538K
Clean Claim Rate$0$14K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K$28K
Cumulative$0$633K$1.3M$1.9M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M$2.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-15.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
21.5x
Headroom (turns)
330%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 330% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -15.0x, adding 114.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.5M$-1.5M-3.4%
Year 1$-1.5M+$1.5M$20K0.0%
Year 2$-1.6M+$2.3M$749K1.7%
Year 3$-1.6M+$2.3M$702K1.6%
Year 4$-1.7M+$2.3M$653K1.5%
Year 5$-1.7M+$2.3M$603K1.4%
$-14.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$6.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$21.5M
Value Created
$603K
Exit EBITDA
$-2.4M
Organic Growth
$23.2M
RCM Value Creation
$603K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$442K$663K$884K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$437K$656K$875K$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$269K$403K$538K$645K
Clean Claim Rate$14K$21K$28K$34K
Total$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M$2.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 20 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-3.4%-9.2%-0.5%5.0%
P35
Net-to-Gross57.7%46.8%56.0%69.7%
P50
Occupancy31.8%21.0%28.5%37.0%
P65
Rev/Bed$2.6M$765K$1.5M$2.5M
P75
Exp/Bed$2.7M$878K$1.5M$2.4M
P75

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML