Competitive Intelligence — CHINLE COMPREHENSIVE CARE FACILITY
CCN 030084 | AZ | 60 beds | Nat'l margin P62 | 8 gaps to P75
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$0
Net Revenue
0.0%
Margin (P62)
60
Beds
6,123
National Universe
4
Peer Groups
Percentile Rankings — All Metrics
Percentile rank across 4 peer groups. Bar shows position: left = bottom of peers, right = top. Green = favorable direction, red = unfavorable. Direction: ▲ higher is better, ▼ lower is better, ▶ neutral.
Data: CMS HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitals with complete financials
| Metric | Value | National (n=6,122) | AZ State (n=123) | Size-Matched (n=2,149) | AZ Size-Matched (n=47) | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bed Count | 60 | P48 | P42 | P48 | P45 | ▶ neutral |
| Occupancy Rate | 27.8% | P22 | P16 | P18 | P13 | ▲ higher |
| Expense per Bed | $3.6M | P94 | P92 | P97 | P96 | ▼ lower |
| Medicare Day % | 32.4% | P54 | P71 | P53 | P53 | ▶ neutral |
| Medicaid Day % | 53.5% | P98 | P93 | P98 | P91 | ▶ neutral |
| Commercial Payer % | 14.1% | P2 | P2 | P1 | P4 | ▲ higher |
| Payer Diversity Index | 0.589 | P91 | P72 | P89 | P83 | ▲ higher |
| Total Patient Days | 6,080 | P37 | P30 | P23 | P15 | ▲ higher |
Value Creation Gaps — Path to P75
Metrics where the target trails size-matched P75 peers. Each gap represents quantifiable value creation opportunity. Estimated EBITDA impact assumes linear improvement proportional to revenue.
| Metric | Current | P75 Target | Gap | Percentile | Est. Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense per Bed | $3.6M | $1.3M | -$3.3M | P96 | ~$20.0M |
| Expense per Bed | $3.6M | $1.6M | -$3.2M | P97 | ~$19.4M |
| Total Patient Days | 6,080 | 18,508 | +12,428 | P23 | — |
| Total Patient Days | 6,080 | 17,920 | +11,840 | P15 | — |
| Commercial Payer % | 14.1% | 72.4% | +58.3% | P1 | — |
| Commercial Payer % | 14.1% | 69.9% | +55.7% | P4 | — |
| Occupancy Rate | 27.8% | 73.2% | +45.4% | P13 | — |
| Occupancy Rate | 27.8% | 72.3% | +44.6% | P18 | — |
Top Size-Matched Peers
30–120 beds, ranked by revenue. Click any peer for full profile.
| Hospital | State | Beds | Revenue | Margin | Medicare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CHINLE COMPREHENSIVE CARE FACI (Target) | AZ | 60 | $0 | 0.0% | 32% |
| DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE | MA | 30 | $1.88B | -35.1% | 35% |
| MIDWESTERN REGIONAL MEDICAL CE | IL | 73 | $1.38B | 80.5% | 30% |
| SMDC MEDICAL CENTER | MN | 118 | $519.2M | -7.1% | 27% |
| RANCHO LOS AMIGOS NATL.REHAB.C | CA | 83 | $512.6M | 41.9% | 5% |
| WENTWORTH DOUGLASS HOSPITAL | NH | 118 | $500.9M | 10.7% | 35% |
| MCHS - SOUTHWEST MINNESOTA REG | MN | 118 | $473.6M | -9.8% | 32% |
| USC NORRIS CANCER HOSPITAL | CA | 60 | $468.7M | 19.1% | 24% |
| THE HEART HOSPITAL BAYLOR PLAN | TX | 109 | $464.6M | 25.7% | 39% |
| SARAH BUSH LINCOLN HEALTH CENT | IL | 100 | $448.6M | -18.1% | 42% |
| ST. JOSEPHS COMM. HOSPT. | WI | 70 | $436.8M | 66.1% | 32% |