Market Analysis — CLARKS SUMMIT STATE HOSPITAL
PA market | 5 hospitals | HHI: nan (Competitive)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
← DashboardPRFProfileMEMIC MemoBRGBridgeCIComp IntelSCNScenariosAIMLDCFDCFLBOLBOFIN3-StmtMKTMarketDENDenialRETReturnsLVRLeversWFLWaterfallPLYPlaybookTRDTrendsPREDPredictedMEM2Memo
5
Hospitals in Market
810
Total Beds
$0.8B
Market Revenue
Competitive
HHI: nan
Narrow
Moat Rating (5/10)
#5
Market Share Rank
Competitive Moat (Mauboussin Framework)
Based on "Measuring the Moat" adapted for healthcare. Score 0-10: wide (8+), narrow (5-7), none (<5).
Scale Advantagemoderate
Switching Costshigh
Market Share0.0%
Top 3 Concentration95.3%
Network Density0.62
Margin vs Market+20.7%
Bed Util vs Market+8.1%
What This Means
This hospital has a narrow moat — narrow moat — some competitive advantages, but vulnerable to new entrants. The PA market is competitive — many players, value creation must come from operations not market power (HHI: nan).
Implications: Operational improvements are the primary value driver — see the EBITDA bridge. Compare against peers via comparables or see the full PA market.
Top Competitors
| Hospital | Beds | Revenue | Rev Share | Bed Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| COMMUNITY MEDICAL CENTER | 266 | $474M | 57.8% | 32.8% |
| REGIONAL HOSPITAL OF SCRANTON | 220 | $221M | 27.0% | 27.2% |
| POCONO MEDICAL CENTER DICKSON CITY | 40 | $86M | 10.5% | 4.9% |
| MOSES TAYLOR HOSPITAL | 81 | $39M | 4.7% | 10.0% |
Regional Payer Mix
■ Medicare 25%■ Medicaid 9%■ Commercial 66%