Corpus Intelligence ML Analysis — COOPERSTOWN MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 14:41 UTC
ML Analysis — COOPERSTOWN MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 351306 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.

Investability Score

Speculative — only pursue if turnaround thesis is strong and entry multiple reflects risk.

44
/ 100 (D)
Financial Health4/25
RCM Upside18/25
Market Position14/20
Demand Defensibility4/15
Operational Efficiency4/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
  • Negative operating margin
  • Heavy Medicare dependence (>55%)
  • Small facility (<50 beds) — limited scale
  • Low occupancy (<30%) — demand risk
  • Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
  • Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
  • Limited competition supports pricing power

Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)

-19.4%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -32.2%

Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-47.7%, 8.9%]. P21 nationally.

DriverValueEffectExplanation
Revenue/Bed591162.000-0.1379
Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin
Expense/Bed781836.778+0.1078
Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin
Log(Beds)2.197-0.0506
Lower Log(Beds) decreases predicted margin
Net-to-Gross0.805+0.0489
Higher Net-to-Gross increases predicted margin
Reimbursement Quality0.336-0.0388
Higher Reimbursement Quality decreases predicted m
Turnaround: 20%Low turnaround probability (20%). Structural disadvantages in Revenue/Bed and Expense/Bed.
Rural/Critical Access
Archetype
62.8%
Distress Risk
$4.4M
RCM Opportunity
A
Opportunity Grade
51.1%
Projected Margin

Cluster: Rural/Critical Access

Percentile within cluster: P67. Rural/small hospitals face structural headwinds. Evaluate CAH conversion, telehealth, and rural health funding.

Nearest Peers

HospitalStateBeds
BRECKINRIDGE HEALTH INCKY25
SHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOSPITALMT19
DAYTON GENERAL HOSPITALWA25
BLUE MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL DISTRICTOR16
COMMUNITY HOSPITALWY25
CARLE EUREKA HOSPITALIL25

Distress Analysis

Risk: High
National distress rate: 49.3%
ND distress rate: 69.4%
Model AUC: 0.629
FactorValueContributionDirection
Occupancy Rate0.162+0.337▲ risk
Net To Gross Ratio0.805+0.194▲ risk
Medicaid Day Pct0.029-0.060▼ risk
Revenue Per Bed591162.000+0.058▲ risk
Medicare Day Pct0.553+0.039▲ risk
Beds9.000-0.019▼ risk

RCM Improvement Opportunity

Total (risk-adjusted): $4.4M
Current margin: -32.2%
Projected margin: 51.1%
Grade: A
Comps: 483

Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.

LeverCurrentBenchmarkGapImpactConfidenceTimeline
Payer Mix Optimization0.4180.59117.3%$2.6M50%24mo
Occupancy Improvement0.1620.44128.0%$1.8M55%24mo

Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)

A
RCM Grade

Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.

MetricPredicted90% CIPercentileAssessment
Denial Rate2.0%[2.0%, 25.0%]P0Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall
Days in AR32.8[25.0, 75.0]P73Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally
Clean Claim Rate98.0%[80.0%, 98.0%]P0Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third.
Net Collection Rate99.5%[90.0%, 99.5%]P8Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third.