Corpus Intelligence ML Analysis — LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 11:28 UTC
ML Analysis — LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 140276 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.

Investability Score

Buy — solid fundamentals with identifiable value creation levers. Proceed to detailed diligence.

66
/ 100 (B)
Financial Health13/25
RCM Upside20/25
Market Position15/20
Demand Defensibility13/15
Operational Efficiency6/15
Entry Multiple: 9.5x – 11.5x
Est. MOIC: 2.3x
Risk Factors:
  • Negative operating margin
  • Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
  • RCM optimization could add 3-5pp margin
  • Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
  • Limited competition supports pricing power

Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)

-4.6%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -9.9%

Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-32.9%, 23.7%]. P50 nationally.

DriverValueEffectExplanation
Expense/Bed2988916.025-0.1641
Higher Expense/Bed decreases predicted margin
Revenue/Bed2719163.971+0.1591
Higher Revenue/Bed increases predicted margin
Bed Count516.000-0.0573
Higher Bed Count decreases predicted margin
Log(Beds)6.246+0.0435
Higher Log(Beds) increases predicted margin
Bed Utilization Value1788044.300+0.0304
Higher Bed Utilization Value increases predicted m
Turnaround: 42%Turnaround possible (42%) but uncertain. Margin improvement depends on improving Expense/Bed.
Large Academic Medical Ce
Archetype
42.9%
Distress Risk
$1.4M
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
-9.8%
Projected Margin

Cluster: Large Academic Medical Center

Percentile within cluster: P51. Large medical centers trade at premium multiples (12-14x). Limited PE value creation but strong cash flow.

Nearest Peers

HospitalStateBeds
NORTH CAROLINA BAPTIST HOSPITALNC800
HACKENSACK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTERNJ779
TEMPLE UNIVERSITY HOSPITALPA761
VCU HEALTH SYSTEM MCV HOSPITALVA842
UH CLEVELAND MEDICAL CENTEROH660
FROEDTERT MEM. LUTHERAN HOSPT.WI731

Distress Analysis

Risk: Elevated
National distress rate: 49.3%
IL distress rate: 51.0%
Model AUC: 0.629
FactorValueContributionDirection
Occupancy Rate0.658-0.123▼ risk
Revenue Per Bed2719163.971-0.067▼ risk
Medicaid Day Pct0.024-0.065▼ risk
Beds516.000+0.049▲ risk
Net To Gross Ratio0.288-0.036▼ risk
Medicare Day Pct0.236-0.016▼ risk

RCM Improvement Opportunity

Total (risk-adjusted): $1.4M
Current margin: -9.9%
Projected margin: -9.8%
Grade: D
Comps: 32

Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.

LeverCurrentBenchmarkGapImpactConfidenceTimeline
Occupancy Improvement0.6580.84618.8%$1.2M55%24mo
Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement0.2880.2890.1%$206K65%18mo

Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)

A
RCM Grade

Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.

MetricPredicted90% CIPercentileAssessment
Denial Rate2.0%[2.0%, 25.0%]P0Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall
Days in AR25.0[25.0, 75.0]P0Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally
Clean Claim Rate98.0%[80.0%, 98.0%]P0Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third.
Net Collection Rate99.5%[90.0%, 99.5%]P8Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third.