Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — ASHLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:04 UTC
IC Memo — ASHLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Investment Committee Memorandum | UT | 39 beds | Grade C | EBITDA uplift $4.7M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

ASHLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

CCN 460030 | UINTAH, UT | 39 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
C
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

ASHLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER is a 39-bed safety-net/medicaid heavy in UINTAH, UT with $64.5M in net patient revenue and a 15.6% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 26.7% Medicare, 32.1% Medicaid, and 41.2% commercial.

Thesis: Turnaround. Our ML models identify $4.7M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from 15.6% to 23.0% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$64.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$10.1M
Operating Margin COMPUTED15.6%
Occupancy HCRIS20.5%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$1.7M
Net-to-Gross HCRIS37.8%
Distress Probability ML61.7%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

59
UT Hospitals
8.0%
State Median Margin
24
Comparable Hospitals

UT has 59 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of 8.0%. The target's margin of 15.6% places it above the state median. Among 24 size-comparable peers (20-78 beds), the median margin is 3.0%. The target performs in line with or above peers.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (20-78), prioritizing same-state peers. 24 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
ASHLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER (Target)UT39$64.5M15.6%
CEDAR CITY HOSPITALUT48$136.8M31.4%
LONE PEAK HOSPITALUT61$133.1M25.2%
ALTA VIEW HOSPITALUT57$130.9M-0.6%
GUNNISON VALLEY HOSPITALUT25$130.4M-6.4%
LAYTON HOSPITALUT37$121.1M9.5%
PARK CITY HOSPITALUT37$120.8M13.7%
UINTAH BASIN MEDICAL CENTERUT33$119.9M1.8%
MOUNTAIN WEST MEDICAL CENTERUT36$96.1M38.5%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $4.7M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$1.4M+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$1.3M+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$1.3M+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$785K+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$41K+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$1.4M
Cost to Collect
$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction
$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction
$785K
Clean Claim Rate
$41K
Total EBITDA Uplift$4.7M
Current EBITDA$10.1M
+ RCM Uplift+$4.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA$14.8M
Current Margin15.6%
Pro Forma Margin23.0%
WC Released (1x)$2.5M

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$15.5M$114.1M7.35x49.0%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$15.5M$130.5M8.41x53.1%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$14.0M$151.2M10.82x61.0%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$14.0M$169.1M12.10x64.6%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$17.1M$85.3M4.99x37.9%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$17.1M$99.4M5.82x42.2%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
MediumElevated Medicaid exposure (32.1%)Medicaid reimburses below cost in most states. Mitigant: denial reduction lever has highest impact on Medicaid claims
MediumLow occupancyAt 20.5%, fixed costs are spread over fewer patient days. Mitigant: volume growth is an additional upside lever not modeled in base case
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 61.7% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 24 hospitals with 20-78 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=25)
  • Comp margins: P25=-12.6% / P50=3.0% / P75=13.9%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.