Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASHLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASHLEY REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 460030 | UT | 39 beds | Current EBITDA $10.1M → Pro Forma $13.5M (+$3.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$64.5M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$3.4M
Modeled Uplift
$2.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.1M (vs $3.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$785K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$41K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$35K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$198K$587K$785K$2.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$41K$41K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT68.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$323K$645K$968K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$319K$639K$958K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$262K$523K$785K$785K$785K$785K$785K
Clean Claim Rate$0$21K$41K$41K$41K$41K$41K$41K
Cumulative$0$924K$1.8M$2.8M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M$3.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.3x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.1M$10.1M15.6%
Year 1$10.4M+$2.3M$12.7M19.6%
Year 2$10.7M+$3.4M$14.1M21.9%
Year 3$11.0M+$3.4M$14.4M22.4%
Year 4$11.4M+$3.4M$14.8M22.9%
Year 5$11.7M+$3.4M$15.1M23.4%
$100.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$166.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$65.1M
Value Created
$15.1M
Exit EBITDA
$16.1M
Organic Growth
$33.9M
RCM Value Creation
$15.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$645K$968K$1.3M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$639K$958K$1.3M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$393K$589K$785K$942K
Clean Claim Rate$21K$31K$41K$50K
Total$1.7M$2.5M$3.4M$4.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 25 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.6%-12.4%4.3%14.5%
P76
Net-to-Gross37.8%38.0%45.1%68.1%
P20
Occupancy20.5%26.3%32.9%56.1%
P16
Rev/Bed$1.7M$536K$1.7M$2.4M
P48
Exp/Bed$1.4M$621K$1.4M$2.1M
P48

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML