Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — BAILEY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:59 UTC
IC Memo — BAILEY MEDICAL CENTER
Investment Committee Memorandum | OK | 33 beds | Grade D | EBITDA uplift $4.0M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

BAILEY MEDICAL CENTER

CCN 370228 | TULSA, OK | 33 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
D
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

BAILEY MEDICAL CENTER is a 33-bed suburban community hospital in TULSA, OK with $54.6M in net patient revenue and a 13.3% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 13.0% Medicare, 24.1% Medicaid, and 62.9% commercial.

Thesis: Turnaround. Our ML models identify $4.0M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from 13.3% to 20.7% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$54.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$7.3M
Operating Margin COMPUTED13.3%
Occupancy HCRIS24.7%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$1.7M
Net-to-Gross HCRIS15.8%
Distress Probability ML55.9%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

147
OK Hospitals
-8.8%
State Median Margin
88
Comparable Hospitals

OK has 147 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of -8.8%. The target's margin of 13.3% places it above the state median. Among 88 size-comparable peers (16-66 beds), the median margin is -10.7%. The target performs in line with or above peers.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (16-66), prioritizing same-state peers. 88 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
BAILEY MEDICAL CENTER (Target)OK33$54.6M13.3%
STILLWATER MEDICAL CENTEROK52$270.2M-9.9%
ST ANTHONY SHAWNEE HOSPITALOK57$169.2M-6.1%
OKLAHOMA HEART HOSPITAL SOUTHOK43$148.5M-0.6%
COMMUNITY HOSPITALOK45$143.9M21.7%
INTEGRIS CANADIAN VALLEY HOSPIOK66$84.9M4.6%
OKLAHOMA SPINE HOSPITALOK23$79.0M8.4%
JACKSON COUNTY MEMORIAL HOSPITOK49$75.5M-10.7%
TULSA SPINE HOSPITALOK38$69.5M11.6%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $4.0M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$1.1M+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$1.1M+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$1.1M+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$665K+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$35K+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$1.1M
Cost to Collect
$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction
$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction
$665K
Clean Claim Rate
$35K
Total EBITDA Uplift$4.0M
Current EBITDA$7.3M
+ RCM Uplift+$4.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA$11.3M
Current Margin13.3%
Pro Forma Margin20.7%
WC Released (1x)$2.1M

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$11.2M$88.1M7.89x51.1%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$11.2M$100.5M9.00x55.2%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$10.1M$117.4M11.68x63.5%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$10.1M$131.1M13.04x67.1%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$12.3M$64.4M5.24x39.3%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$12.3M$74.8M6.09x43.5%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
MediumElevated Medicaid exposure (24.1%)Medicaid reimburses below cost in most states. Mitigant: denial reduction lever has highest impact on Medicaid claims
MediumLow occupancyAt 24.7%, fixed costs are spread over fewer patient days. Mitigant: volume growth is an additional upside lever not modeled in base case
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 55.9% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk
LowLow net-to-gross ratioLarge contractual allowances suggest pricing discipline issues. Mitigant: payer renegotiation is an additional upside lever

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 88 hospitals with 16-66 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=89)
  • Comp margins: P25=-24.1% / P50=-10.7% / P75=3.0%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.