Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAILEY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:57 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAILEY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 370228 | OK | 33 beds | Current EBITDA $7.3M → Pro Forma $10.1M (+$2.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$54.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$2.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$665K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$35K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$30K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$168K$497K$665K$2.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$35K$35K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$273K$546K$819K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$270K$541K$811K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$222K$443K$665K$665K$665K$665K$665K
Clean Claim Rate$0$17K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K$35K
Cumulative$0$782K$1.6M$2.3M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.4x60% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x
9.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
11.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
7%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 7% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.3M$7.3M13.3%
Year 1$7.5M+$1.9M$9.4M17.2%
Year 2$7.7M+$2.9M$10.6M19.4%
Year 3$7.9M+$2.9M$10.8M19.8%
Year 4$8.2M+$2.9M$11.0M20.2%
Year 5$8.4M+$2.9M$11.3M20.7%
$72.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$124.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$51.6M
Value Created
$11.3M
Exit EBITDA
$11.6M
Organic Growth
$28.7M
RCM Value Creation
$11.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$546K$819K$1.1M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$541K$811K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$332K$498K$665K$798K
Clean Claim Rate$17K$26K$35K$42K
Total$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$3.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 89 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.3%-23.9%-10.3%3.3%
P89
Net-to-Gross15.8%20.6%35.9%50.2%
P8
Occupancy24.7%17.0%29.1%54.3%
P40
Rev/Bed$1.7M$374K$626K$1.1M
P89
Exp/Bed$1.4M$439K$708K$1.4M
P75

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML