Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — AURORA WESTBOROUGH BHS 2026-04-26 09:09 UTC
IC Memo — AURORA WESTBOROUGH BHS
Investment Committee Memorandum | MA | 123 beds | Grade C | EBITDA uplift $1.3M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

AURORA WESTBOROUGH BHS

CCN 224044 | nan, MA | 123 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
C
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

AURORA WESTBOROUGH BHS is a 123-bed under-performing / distressed in nan, MA with $18.0M in net patient revenue and a -46.6% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 8.8% Medicare, 1.0% Medicaid, and 90.2% commercial.

Thesis: Undervalued. Our ML models identify $1.3M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from -46.6% to -39.3% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$18.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$-8.4M
Operating Margin COMPUTED-46.6%
Occupancy HCRIS31.4%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$146K
Net-to-Gross HCRIS50.7%
Distress Probability ML54.8%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

99
MA Hospitals
-12.2%
State Median Margin
57
Comparable Hospitals

MA has 99 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of -12.2%. The target's margin of -46.6% places it below the state median. Among 57 size-comparable peers (62-246 beds), the median margin is -9.3%. The target's below-peer margin suggests operational improvement opportunity.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (62-246), prioritizing same-state peers. 57 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
AURORA WESTBOROUGH BHS (Target)MA123$18.0M-46.6%
NEWTON WELLESLEY HOSPITALMA216$624.3M-4.7%
CAPE COD HOSPITALMA239$620.3M-1.3%
BERKSHIRE MEDICAL CENTERMA238$522.9M-12.9%
STEWARD ST. ELIZABETHS MEDICALMA244$428.5M0.7%
SAINT VINCENT HOSPITALMA232$404.2M0.2%
CAMBRIDGE HEALTH ALLIANCEMA225$383.9M-50.0%
BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS - PLYMOUMA150$349.1M2.6%
MOUNT AUBURN HOSPITALMA186$337.4M-8.4%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $1.3M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$377K+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$360K+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$356K+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$219K+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$12K+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$377K
Cost to Collect
$360K
Denial Rate Reduction
$356K
A/R Days Reduction
$219K
Clean Claim Rate
$12K
Total EBITDA Uplift$1.3M
Current EBITDA$-8.4M
+ RCM Uplift+$1.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA$-7.1M
Current Margin-46.6%
Pro Forma Margin-39.3%
WC Released (1x)$689K

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$-12.9M$-42.1M0.00x-100.0%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$-12.9M$-50.4M0.00x-100.0%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$-11.6M$-50.3M0.00x-100.0%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$-11.6M$-58.3M0.00x-100.0%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$-14.2M$-44.5M0.00x-100.0%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$-14.2M$-53.5M0.00x-100.0%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
HighNegative operating marginRCM uplift bridge shows clear path to profitability; working capital release provides near-term cash cushion
MediumLow occupancyAt 31.4%, fixed costs are spread over fewer patient days. Mitigant: volume growth is an additional upside lever not modeled in base case
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 54.8% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 57 hospitals with 62-246 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=58)
  • Comp margins: P25=-17.9% / P50=-9.3% / P75=1.0%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.