Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AURORA WESTBOROUGH BHS 2026-04-26 11:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AURORA WESTBOROUGH BHS
CCN 224044 | MA | 123 beds | Current EBITDA $-8.4M → Pro Forma $-7.4M (+$946K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-8.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$946K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-7.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$689K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

60%
Realization (C)
$946K
Modeled Uplift
$572K
Risk-Adjusted
-$374K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 60% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$360K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$356K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$219K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$946K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$360K$360K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$346K$10K$356K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$55K$164K$219K$689K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$90K$180K$270K$360K$360K$360K$360K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$89K$178K$267K$356K$356K$356K$356K
A/R Days Reduction$0$73K$146K$219K$219K$219K$219K$219K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$258K$515K$767K$946K$946K$946K$946K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $946K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-8.4M$-8.4M-46.6%
Year 1$-8.6M+$630K$-8.0M-44.5%
Year 2$-8.9M+$946K$-7.9M-44.2%
Year 3$-9.2M+$946K$-8.2M-45.7%
Year 4$-9.4M+$946K$-8.5M-47.2%
Year 5$-9.7M+$946K$-8.8M-48.8%
$-83.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-96.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$-12.7M
Value Created
$-8.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-13.3M
Organic Growth
$9.5M
RCM Value Creation
$-8.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$180K$270K$360K$431K
Denial Rate Reductio$178K$267K$356K$427K
A/R Days Reduction$109K$164K$219K$262K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$473K$709K$946K$1.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 58 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-46.6%-18.4%-10.1%0.7%
P4
Net-to-Gross50.7%35.3%43.3%53.8%
P68
Occupancy31.4%59.3%66.9%80.9%
P0
Rev/Bed$146K$380K$1.2M$1.8M
P0
Exp/Bed$214K$331K$1.3M$1.9M
P0

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML