Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — WEST VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:28 UTC
IC Memo — WEST VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER
Investment Committee Memorandum | ID | 112 beds | Grade C | EBITDA uplift $8.7M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

WEST VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER

CCN 130014 | CANYON, ID | 112 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
C
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

WEST VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER is a 112-bed safety-net/medicaid heavy in CANYON, ID with $118.1M in net patient revenue and a 24.6% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 15.8% Medicare, 32.7% Medicaid, and 51.5% commercial.

Thesis: Turnaround. Our ML models identify $8.7M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from 24.6% to 32.0% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$118.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$29.1M
Operating Margin COMPUTED24.6%
Occupancy HCRIS32.8%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$1.1M
Net-to-Gross HCRIS19.5%
Distress Probability ML57.8%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

51
ID Hospitals
-3.5%
State Median Margin
9
Comparable Hospitals

ID has 51 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of -3.5%. The target's margin of 24.6% places it above the state median. Among 9 size-comparable peers (56-224 beds), the median margin is -3.0%. The target performs in line with or above peers.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (56-224), prioritizing same-state peers. 9 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
WEST VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER (Target)ID112$118.1M24.6%
ST LUKES MAGIC VALLEY REG MED ID175$482.9M-6.8%
PORTNEUF MEDICAL CENTERID142$390.3M13.4%
ST. ALPHONSUS MEDICAL CENTER -ID96$263.3M15.2%
ST. LUKES NAMPA MEDICAL CENTERID87$255.6M-10.1%
ST JOSEPH REGIONAL MEDICAL CENID110$168.4M-3.0%
IDAHO FALLS COMMUNITY HOSPITALID88$98.9M-23.1%
INTERMOUNTAINID150$31.5M26.3%
STATE HOSPITAL SOUTHID110$27.7M-29.4%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $8.7M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$2.5M+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$2.4M+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$2.3M+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$1.4M+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$76K+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$2.5M
Cost to Collect
$2.4M
Denial Rate Reduction
$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction
$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate
$76K
Total EBITDA Uplift$8.7M
Current EBITDA$29.1M
+ RCM Uplift+$8.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA$37.7M
Current Margin24.6%
Pro Forma Margin32.0%
WC Released (1x)$4.5M

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$44.7M$278.6M6.23x44.2%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$44.7M$320.9M7.18x48.3%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$40.2M$364.1M9.05x55.4%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$40.2M$409.1M10.17x59.0%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$49.2M$220.6M4.49x35.0%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$49.2M$258.6M5.26x39.4%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
MediumElevated Medicaid exposure (32.7%)Medicaid reimburses below cost in most states. Mitigant: denial reduction lever has highest impact on Medicaid claims
MediumLow occupancyAt 32.8%, fixed costs are spread over fewer patient days. Mitigant: volume growth is an additional upside lever not modeled in base case
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 57.8% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk
LowLow net-to-gross ratioLarge contractual allowances suggest pricing discipline issues. Mitigant: payer renegotiation is an additional upside lever

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 9 hospitals with 56-224 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=10)
  • Comp margins: P25=-10.1% / P50=-3.0% / P75=14.0%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.