Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — MT. GRAHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 09:38 UTC
IC Memo — MT. GRAHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
Investment Committee Memorandum | AZ | 25 beds | Grade C | EBITDA uplift $5.5M
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

MT. GRAHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER

CCN 031319 | GRAHAM, AZ | 25 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
C
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

MT. GRAHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER is a 25-bed safety-net/medicaid heavy in GRAHAM, AZ with $75.2M in net patient revenue and a -2.8% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 19.9% Medicare, 27.6% Medicaid, and 52.5% commercial.

Thesis: Turnaround. Our ML models identify $5.5M in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from -2.8% to 4.6% (+736bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$75.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$-2.1M
Operating Margin COMPUTED-2.8%
Occupancy HCRIS41.0%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$3.0M
Net-to-Gross HCRIS43.0%
Distress Probability ML54.3%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

124
AZ Hospitals
-0.8%
State Median Margin
41
Comparable Hospitals

AZ has 124 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of -0.8%. The target's margin of -2.8% places it below the state median. Among 41 size-comparable peers (12-50 beds), the median margin is -0.7%. The target's below-peer margin suggests operational improvement opportunity.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (12-50), prioritizing same-state peers. 41 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
MT. GRAHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CE (Target)AZ25$75.2M-2.8%
ARIZONA GENERAL HOSPITALAZ50$116.2M-6.6%
ARIZONA GENERAL HOSPITALAZ16$97.1M10.4%
THE CORE INSTITUTE SPECIALTY HAZ28$91.2M9.2%
COBRE VALLEY REG. MEDICAL CENTAZ25$74.9M-10.3%
COPPER QUEEN COMM. HOSP.AZ14$63.5M6.6%
MT. GRAHAM REGIONAL MEDICAL CEAZ25$49.4M-6.8%
BANNER PAYSON MEDICAL CENTERAZ25$49.3M0.0%
AZ SPINE & JOINT HOSPITALAZ23$45.1M19.4%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $5.5M (736bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$1.6M+210bp18mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$1.5M+200bp12mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$1.5M+198bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$915K+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$48K+6bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$1.6M
Cost to Collect
$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction
$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction
$915K
Clean Claim Rate
$48K
Total EBITDA Uplift$5.5M
Current EBITDA$-2.1M
+ RCM Uplift+$5.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA$3.4M
Current Margin-2.8%
Pro Forma Margin4.6%
WC Released (1x)$2.9M

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$-3.2M$41.6M0.00x-100.0%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$-3.2M$44.7M0.00x-100.0%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$-2.9M$61.9M0.00x-100.0%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$-2.9M$66.7M0.00x-100.0%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$-3.5M$14.9M0.00x-100.0%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$-3.5M$15.3M0.00x-100.0%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
HighNegative operating marginRCM uplift bridge shows clear path to profitability; working capital release provides near-term cash cushion
MediumElevated Medicaid exposure (27.6%)Medicaid reimburses below cost in most states. Mitigant: denial reduction lever has highest impact on Medicaid claims
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 54.3% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 41 hospitals with 12-50 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=42)
  • Comp margins: P25=-10.1% / P50=-0.7% / P75=8.2%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.