Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CHEYENNE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 13:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CHEYENNE REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 530014 | WY | 147 beds | Current EBITDA $16.9M → Pro Forma $36.4M (+$19.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$372.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$16.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$36.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$19.6M
Modeled Uplift
$14.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.6M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.0M (vs $19.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$238K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.4M$7.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.2M$205K$7.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.4M$4.5M$14.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$238K$238K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.8M$3.7M$5.5M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$119K$238K$238K$238K$238K$238K$238K
Cumulative$0$5.3M$10.7M$15.9M$19.6M$19.6M$19.6M$19.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x69% / 13.7x73% / 15.6x77% / 17.5x79% / 18.4x81% / 19.4x
9.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.5x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.9x
10.0x60% / 10.3x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.1x72% / 14.9x
11.0x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x68% / 13.2x
12.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.6x
Headroom (turns)
40%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 40% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.9x, adding 4.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$16.9M$16.9M4.5%
Year 1$17.4M+$13.1M$30.4M8.2%
Year 2$17.9M+$19.6M$37.5M10.1%
Year 3$18.4M+$19.6M$38.0M10.2%
Year 4$19.0M+$19.6M$38.6M10.4%
Year 5$19.5M+$19.6M$39.1M10.5%
$168.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$430.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$261.9M
Value Created
$39.1M
Exit EBITDA
$26.8M
Organic Growth
$195.9M
RCM Value Creation
$39.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.7M$5.6M$7.4M$8.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.7M$5.5M$7.4M$8.8M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.4M$4.5M$5.4M
Clean Claim Rate$119K$179K$238K$286K
Total$9.8M$14.7M$19.6M$23.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 2056 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.5%-13.7%-3.3%7.1%
P70
Net-to-Gross35.7%19.4%27.4%37.4%
P72
Occupancy62.3%47.2%61.5%75.0%
P51
Rev/Bed$2.5M$545K$1.2M$1.7M
P92
Exp/Bed$2.4M$547K$1.2M$1.8M
P89

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML