Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SELF REGIONAL HEALTHCARE 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SELF REGIONAL HEALTHCARE
CCN 420071 | SC | 290 beds | Current EBITDA $19.2M → Pro Forma $40.8M (+$21.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$410.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$19.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$21.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$40.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$15.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$21.6M
Modeled Uplift
$14.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.4M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $14.2M (vs $21.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$8.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$8.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$262K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$21.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$8.2M$8.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.9M$226K$8.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.3M$3.7M$5.0M$15.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$262K$262K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT27.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.1M$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M$8.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.0M$4.1M$6.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M$8.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.7M$3.3M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M$5.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$131K$262K$262K$262K$262K$262K$262K
Cumulative$0$5.9M$11.8M$17.5M$21.6M$21.6M$21.6M$21.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $21.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x68% / 13.4x73% / 15.3x77% / 17.2x78% / 18.1x80% / 19.0x
9.0x63% / 11.6x68% / 13.2x72% / 14.9x73% / 15.7x75% / 16.5x
10.0x59% / 10.1x63% / 11.6x67% / 13.1x69% / 13.8x71% / 14.6x
11.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x67% / 12.9x
12.0x51% / 7.9x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x61% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.5x
Headroom (turns)
39%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 39% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.0x, adding 4.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$19.2M$19.2M4.7%
Year 1$19.8M+$14.4M$34.2M8.3%
Year 2$20.4M+$21.6M$41.9M10.2%
Year 3$21.0M+$21.6M$42.6M10.4%
Year 4$21.6M+$21.6M$43.2M10.5%
Year 5$22.3M+$21.6M$43.8M10.7%
$192.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$482.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$290.2M
Value Created
$43.8M
Exit EBITDA
$30.6M
Organic Growth
$215.8M
RCM Value Creation
$43.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.1M$6.2M$8.2M$9.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.1M$6.1M$8.1M$9.7M
A/R Days Reduction$2.5M$3.7M$5.0M$6.0M
Clean Claim Rate$131K$197K$262K$315K
Total$10.8M$16.2M$21.6M$25.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 21 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.7%-7.3%-0.0%8.3%
P62
Net-to-Gross32.8%16.4%21.7%27.4%
P90
Occupancy51.5%56.5%64.5%77.0%
P10
Rev/Bed$1.4M$959K$1.5M$1.6M
P43
Exp/Bed$1.3M$959K$1.4M$1.6M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML