Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — VIBRA HOSPITAL OF CENTRAL DAKOTAS L 2026-04-26 08:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — VIBRA HOSPITAL OF CENTRAL DAKOTAS L
CCN 352005 | ND | 41 beds | Current EBITDA $2.6M → Pro Forma $3.2M (+$623K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$11.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$623K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$452K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$623K
Modeled Uplift
$403K
Risk-Adjusted
-$221K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$236K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$235K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$143K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$623K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$236K$236K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$227K$8K$235K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$36K$107K$143K$452K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT79.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$59K$118K$177K$236K$236K$236K$236K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$59K$117K$176K$235K$235K$235K$235K
A/R Days Reduction$0$48K$96K$143K$143K$143K$143K$143K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$170K$340K$506K$623K$623K$623K$623K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $623K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x
9.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x
10.0x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x
12.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.3x
Headroom (turns)
-5%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -5% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.8x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.6M$2.6M21.9%
Year 1$2.7M+$416K$3.1M26.1%
Year 2$2.7M+$623K$3.4M28.5%
Year 3$2.8M+$623K$3.4M29.2%
Year 4$2.9M+$623K$3.5M29.9%
Year 5$3.0M+$623K$3.6M30.7%
$25.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$39.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.0M
Value Created
$3.6M
Exit EBITDA
$4.1M
Organic Growth
$6.2M
RCM Value Creation
$3.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$118K$177K$236K$283K
Denial Rate Reductio$117K$176K$235K$282K
A/R Days Reduction$72K$107K$143K$172K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$312K$468K$623K$748K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 28 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin21.9%-20.5%-9.7%-2.0%
P93
Net-to-Gross23.6%49.1%65.5%79.6%
P4
Occupancy39.8%21.0%34.1%56.7%
P54
Rev/Bed$287K$365K$513K$927K
P15
Exp/Bed$224K$467K$548K$1.1M
P4

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML