Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ERIE COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 05:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ERIE COUNTY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 330219 | NY | 410 beds | Current EBITDA $-134.2M → Pro Forma $-102.4M (+$31.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$604.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-134.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$31.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-102.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$23.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$31.8M
Modeled Uplift
$22.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$9.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $22.4M (vs $31.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$12.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$12.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$387K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$31.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$12.1M$12.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.6M$332K$12.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.9M$5.5M$7.4M$23.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$387K$387K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT41.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.0M$6.0M$9.1M$12.1M$12.1M$12.1M$12.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.0M$6.0M$9.0M$12.0M$12.0M$12.0M$12.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.5M$4.9M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M$7.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$193K$387K$387K$387K$387K$387K$387K
Cumulative$0$8.7M$17.3M$25.8M$31.8M$31.8M$31.8M$31.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $31.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-134.2M$-134.2M-22.2%
Year 1$-138.2M+$21.2M$-117.0M-19.4%
Year 2$-142.4M+$31.8M$-110.6M-18.3%
Year 3$-146.6M+$31.8M$-114.8M-19.0%
Year 4$-151.0M+$31.8M$-119.2M-19.7%
Year 5$-155.6M+$31.8M$-123.8M-20.5%
$-1.34B
Entry EV (10x)
$-1.36B
Exit EV (11x)
$-19.5M
Value Created
$-123.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-213.7M
Organic Growth
$318.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-123.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.0M$9.1M$12.1M$14.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.0M$9.0M$12.0M$14.4M
A/R Days Reduction$3.7M$5.5M$7.4M$8.8M
Clean Claim Rate$193K$290K$387K$464K
Total$15.9M$23.8M$31.8M$38.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 69 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-22.2%-23.1%-17.5%-9.4%
P32
Net-to-Gross42.0%25.4%32.6%41.9%
P74
Occupancy81.4%68.6%79.6%88.4%
P58
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.3M$1.8M$2.3M
P34
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.3M$1.9M$2.6M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML