Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — DIGNITY HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSPIT 2026-04-26 05:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — DIGNITY HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSPIT
CCN 293035 | NV | 60 beds | Current EBITDA $5.0M → Pro Forma $7.2M (+$2.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$41.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$2.2M
Modeled Uplift
$1.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$516K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.7M (vs $2.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$828K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$820K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$504K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$26K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$828K$828K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$797K$23K$820K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$127K$377K$504K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$26K$26K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$207K$414K$621K$828K$828K$828K$828K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$205K$410K$615K$820K$820K$820K$820K
A/R Days Reduction$0$168K$336K$504K$504K$504K$504K$504K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K
Cumulative$0$593K$1.2M$1.8M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x
9.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
10.0x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x
11.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
12.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.6x
Headroom (turns)
9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.9x, adding 2.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.0M$5.0M12.1%
Year 1$5.2M+$1.5M$6.6M16.0%
Year 2$5.3M+$2.2M$7.5M18.1%
Year 3$5.5M+$2.2M$7.7M18.5%
Year 4$5.6M+$2.2M$7.8M18.9%
Year 5$5.8M+$2.2M$8.0M19.3%
$50.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$87.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$37.8M
Value Created
$8.0M
Exit EBITDA
$8.0M
Organic Growth
$21.8M
RCM Value Creation
$8.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$414K$621K$828K$994K
Denial Rate Reductio$410K$615K$820K$984K
A/R Days Reduction$252K$378K$504K$605K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$20K$26K$32K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin12.1%-1.8%5.1%12.2%
P65
Net-to-Gross34.4%27.3%39.2%53.6%
P35
Occupancy88.7%54.5%61.3%71.2%
P88
Rev/Bed$690K$213K$444K$812K
P65
Exp/Bed$606K$308K$454K$606K
P71

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML