Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PAM SPECIALTY HOSPITAL OF LAS VEGAS 2026-04-26 04:59 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PAM SPECIALTY HOSPITAL OF LAS VEGAS
CCN 292006 | NV | 70 beds | Current EBITDA $3.8M → Pro Forma $5.8M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$37.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$560K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$758K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$750K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$461K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$758K$758K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$729K$21K$750K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$116K$345K$461K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$189K$379K$568K$758K$758K$758K$758K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$188K$375K$563K$750K$750K$750K$750K
A/R Days Reduction$0$154K$307K$461K$461K$461K$461K$461K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$543K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.1x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x67% / 13.2x
9.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
10.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.9x
11.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x
12.0x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.8M$3.8M10.1%
Year 1$3.9M+$1.3M$5.3M13.9%
Year 2$4.0M+$2.0M$6.0M15.9%
Year 3$4.2M+$2.0M$6.2M16.3%
Year 4$4.3M+$2.0M$6.3M16.6%
Year 5$4.4M+$2.0M$6.4M16.9%
$38.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$70.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$32.4M
Value Created
$6.4M
Exit EBITDA
$6.1M
Organic Growth
$19.9M
RCM Value Creation
$6.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$379K$568K$758K$909K
Denial Rate Reductio$375K$563K$750K$900K
A/R Days Reduction$230K$346K$461K$553K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$29K
Total$996K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 17 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.1%-10.6%3.7%10.5%
P65
Net-to-Gross27.3%27.3%35.7%53.6%
P24
Occupancy71.2%55.5%62.1%71.2%
P71
Rev/Bed$541K$213K$444K$812K
P59
Exp/Bed$487K$308K$454K$606K
P53

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML