Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ESSENTIA HEALTH MOOSE LAKE 2026-04-26 15:52 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ESSENTIA HEALTH MOOSE LAKE
CCN 241350 | MN | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.9M → Pro Forma $105K (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$38.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$105K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$735K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$762K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$754K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$464K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$762K$762K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$733K$21K$754K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$117K$347K$464K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT62.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$190K$381K$571K$762K$762K$762K$762K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$189K$377K$566K$754K$754K$754K$754K
A/R Days Reduction$0$155K$309K$464K$464K$464K$464K$464K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$546K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-153.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
159.9x
Headroom (turns)
2461%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 2461% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -153.4x, adding 252.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.9M$-1.9M-5.0%
Year 1$-2.0M+$1.3M$-620K-1.6%
Year 2$-2.0M+$2.0M$-11K-0.0%
Year 3$-2.1M+$2.0M$-71K-0.2%
Year 4$-2.1M+$2.0M$-134K-0.4%
Year 5$-2.2M+$2.0M$-198K-0.5%
$-19.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$-2.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$16.8M
Value Created
$-198K
Exit EBITDA
$-3.0M
Organic Growth
$20.0M
RCM Value Creation
$-198K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$381K$571K$762K$914K
Denial Rate Reductio$377K$566K$754K$905K
A/R Days Reduction$232K$348K$464K$556K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$29K
Total$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 93 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-5.0%-9.5%-2.4%3.4%
P40
Net-to-Gross58.5%47.6%56.3%62.3%
P55
Occupancy30.7%16.5%33.7%44.8%
P42
Rev/Bed$1.5M$1.1M$1.9M$2.7M
P40
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.1M$1.8M$2.8M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML