Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SCHWAB REHAB HOSP & CARE NETWORK 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SCHWAB REHAB HOSP & CARE NETWORK
CCN 143025 | IL | 52 beds | Current EBITDA $-713K → Pro Forma $1.7M (+$2.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$46.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-713K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$2.4M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$635K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$923K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$914K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$562K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$30K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$923K$923K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$888K$25K$914K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$142K$420K$562K$1.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$30K$30K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$231K$462K$692K$923K$923K$923K$923K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$228K$457K$685K$914K$914K$914K$914K
A/R Days Reduction$0$187K$374K$562K$562K$562K$562K$562K
Clean Claim Rate$0$15K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K$30K
Cumulative$0$661K$1.3M$2.0M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-3.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
10.0x
Headroom (turns)
154%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 154% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -3.5x, adding 102.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-713K$-713K-1.5%
Year 1$-735K+$1.6M$884K1.9%
Year 2$-757K+$2.4M$1.7M3.6%
Year 3$-780K+$2.4M$1.6M3.6%
Year 4$-803K+$2.4M$1.6M3.5%
Year 5$-827K+$2.4M$1.6M3.5%
$-7.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$17.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$24.7M
Value Created
$1.6M
Exit EBITDA
$-1.1M
Organic Growth
$24.3M
RCM Value Creation
$1.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$462K$692K$923K$1.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$457K$685K$914K$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$281K$421K$562K$674K
Clean Claim Rate$15K$22K$30K$35K
Total$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 45 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.5%-17.3%-6.1%13.3%
P56
Net-to-Gross45.2%23.2%30.2%38.7%
P79
Occupancy86.9%29.1%40.8%53.4%
P96
Rev/Bed$888K$778K$1.2M$1.8M
P28
Exp/Bed$901K$634K$1.2M$1.9M
P27

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML