ML Analysis — SCHWAB REHAB HOSP & CARE NETWORK
CCN 143025 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Hold / Selective — investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.
46
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health7/25
RCM Upside18/25
Market Position9/20
Demand Defensibility8/15
Operational Efficiency4/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
- Negative operating margin
Catalysts:
- Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
-6.2%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -1.6%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-34.5%, 22.1%]. P46 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue/Bed | 887508.981 | -0.0966 | Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| Expense/Bed | 901229.923 | +0.0931 | Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Reimbursement Quality | 0.351 | -0.0430 | Higher Reimbursement Quality decreases predicted m | |
| Occupancy | 0.869 | +0.0195 | Higher Occupancy increases predicted margin | |
| Occupancy × Net-to-Gross | 0.392 | +0.0153 | Higher Occupancy × Net-to-Gross increases predicte |
Turnaround: 39%Turnaround possible (39%) but uncertain. Margin improvement depends on improving Revenue/Bed.
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
42.5%
Distress Risk
$0
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
-1.6%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital
Percentile within cluster: P62. Community hospitals — the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| CLARA MAASS MEDICAL CENTER | NJ | 259 |
| PRESENCE SAINTS MARY & ELIZABETH MED | IL | 266 |
| ADVENTIST HEALTH BAKERSFIELD | CA | 254 |
| BRISTOL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | TN | 244 |
| HOLSTON VALLEY HOSP & MED CTR | TN | 286 |
| SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | OH | 230 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: Elevated
National distress rate: 49.3%
IL distress rate: 51.0%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Rate | 0.869 | -0.319 | ▼ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 887508.981 | +0.041 | ▲ risk |
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.452 | +0.037 | ▲ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.117 | -0.036 | ▼ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.106 | +0.017 | ▲ risk |
| Beds | 52.000 | -0.013 | ▼ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $0
Current margin: -1.6%
Projected margin: -1.6%
Grade: D
Comps: 44
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 25.0 | [25.0, 75.0] | P0 | Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |