Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — LOYOLA UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 140276 | IL | 516 beds | Current EBITDA $-139.2M → Pro Forma $-65.4M (+$73.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.40B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-139.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$73.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-65.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$53.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$73.8M
Modeled Uplift
$50.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$23.2M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $50.6M (vs $73.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$28.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$27.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$17.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$898K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$73.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$28.1M$28.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$27.0M$772K$27.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$4.3M$12.8M$17.1M$53.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$898K$898K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$7.0M$14.0M$21.0M$28.1M$28.1M$28.1M$28.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$6.9M$13.9M$20.8M$27.8M$27.8M$27.8M$27.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$5.7M$11.4M$17.1M$17.1M$17.1M$17.1M$17.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$449K$898K$898K$898K$898K$898K$898K
Cumulative$0$20.1M$40.2M$59.9M$73.8M$73.8M$73.8M$73.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $73.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-139.2M$-139.2M-9.9%
Year 1$-143.4M+$49.2M$-94.2M-6.7%
Year 2$-147.7M+$73.8M$-73.9M-5.3%
Year 3$-152.1M+$73.8M$-78.3M-5.6%
Year 4$-156.7M+$73.8M$-82.8M-5.9%
Year 5$-161.4M+$73.8M$-87.5M-6.2%
$-1.39B
Entry EV (10x)
$-963.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$428.9M
Value Created
$-87.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-221.7M
Organic Growth
$738.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-87.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$14.0M$21.0M$28.1M$33.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$13.9M$20.8M$27.8M$33.3M
A/R Days Reduction$8.5M$12.8M$17.1M$20.5M
Clean Claim Rate$449K$673K$898K$1.1M
Total$36.9M$55.4M$73.8M$88.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 33 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-9.9%-13.0%-5.6%5.1%
P44
Net-to-Gross28.8%20.4%24.2%28.9%
P72
Occupancy65.8%65.8%71.9%84.2%
P24
Rev/Bed$2.7M$1.3M$1.8M$2.6M
P75
Exp/Bed$3.0M$1.3M$1.8M$2.8M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML