Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTHERN IDAHO ADVANCED CARE HOSPITA 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTHERN IDAHO ADVANCED CARE HOSPITA
CCN 132001 | ID | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $-373K → Pro Forma $471K (+$844K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$16.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-373K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$844K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$471K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$615K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$844K
Modeled Uplift
$573K
Risk-Adjusted
-$271K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$321K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$318K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$195K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$844K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$321K$321K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$309K$9K$318K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$49K$146K$195K$615K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT63.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$80K$160K$241K$321K$321K$321K$321K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$79K$159K$238K$318K$318K$318K$318K
A/R Days Reduction$0$65K$130K$195K$195K$195K$195K$195K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$230K$460K$684K$844K$844K$844K$844K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $844K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
13.2x
Headroom (turns)
203%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 203% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -6.7x, adding 105.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-373K$-373K-2.3%
Year 1$-384K+$563K$178K1.1%
Year 2$-396K+$844K$448K2.8%
Year 3$-408K+$844K$436K2.7%
Year 4$-420K+$844K$424K2.6%
Year 5$-432K+$844K$412K2.6%
$-3.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$4.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.3M
Value Created
$412K
Exit EBITDA
$-594K
Organic Growth
$8.4M
RCM Value Creation
$412K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$160K$241K$321K$385K
Denial Rate Reductio$159K$238K$318K$381K
A/R Days Reduction$98K$146K$195K$234K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$8K$10K$12K
Total$422K$633K$844K$1.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 23 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.3%-5.9%-2.3%3.0%
P48
Net-to-Gross51.4%49.0%58.4%63.4%
P35
Occupancy57.7%19.6%34.9%51.9%
P78
Rev/Bed$401K$872K$1.6M$3.1M
P0
Exp/Bed$410K$983K$1.7M$2.6M
P0

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML