Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SHOSHONE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SHOSHONE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 131314 | ID | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-29K → Pro Forma $949K (+$978K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-29K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$978K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$949K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$713K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$978K
Modeled Uplift
$608K
Risk-Adjusted
-$370K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$372K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$368K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$226K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$978K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$372K$372K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$358K$10K$368K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$57K$169K$226K$713K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$93K$186K$279K$372K$372K$372K$372K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$92K$184K$276K$368K$368K$368K$368K
A/R Days Reduction$0$75K$151K$226K$226K$226K$226K$226K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$266K$533K$793K$978K$978K$978K$978K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $978K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-0.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
6.8x
Headroom (turns)
104%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 104% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -0.3x, adding 99.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-29K$-29K-0.2%
Year 1$-30K+$652K$623K3.3%
Year 2$-30K+$978K$948K5.1%
Year 3$-31K+$978K$947K5.1%
Year 4$-32K+$978K$946K5.1%
Year 5$-33K+$978K$945K5.1%
$-287K
Entry EV (10x)
$10.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.7M
Value Created
$945K
Exit EBITDA
$-46K
Organic Growth
$9.8M
RCM Value Creation
$945K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$186K$279K$372K$446K
Denial Rate Reductio$184K$276K$368K$442K
A/R Days Reduction$113K$170K$226K$272K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$489K$734K$978K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 32 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-0.2%-8.8%-3.3%2.3%
P69
Net-to-Gross59.1%52.4%59.8%66.2%
P44
Occupancy24.7%18.9%25.7%48.5%
P41
Rev/Bed$744K$917K$1.6M$2.6M
P12
Exp/Bed$745K$1.0M$1.8M$2.6M
P12

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML