Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. SIMONS BY THE SEA 2026-04-26 09:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. SIMONS BY THE SEA
CCN 114016 | GA | 101 beds | Current EBITDA $896K → Pro Forma $1.6M (+$744K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$896K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$744K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$541K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$744K
Modeled Uplift
$486K
Risk-Adjusted
-$258K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$282K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$280K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$172K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$744K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$282K$282K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$272K$8K$280K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$43K$128K$172K$541K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT32.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$71K$141K$212K$282K$282K$282K$282K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$70K$140K$210K$280K$280K$280K$280K
A/R Days Reduction$0$57K$115K$172K$172K$172K$172K$172K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$203K$405K$603K$744K$744K$744K$744K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $744K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x62% / 11.3x67% / 12.9x71% / 14.5x73% / 15.3x74% / 16.1x
9.0x57% / 9.7x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x70% / 14.0x
10.0x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.7x61% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x
11.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
12.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.9x
Headroom (turns)
29%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 29% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.6x, adding 3.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$896K$896K6.3%
Year 1$923K+$496K$1.4M10.0%
Year 2$951K+$744K$1.7M12.0%
Year 3$979K+$744K$1.7M12.2%
Year 4$1.0M+$744K$1.8M12.4%
Year 5$1.0M+$744K$1.8M12.6%
$9.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$19.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$10.6M
Value Created
$1.8M
Exit EBITDA
$1.4M
Organic Growth
$7.4M
RCM Value Creation
$1.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$141K$212K$282K$339K
Denial Rate Reductio$140K$210K$280K$336K
A/R Days Reduction$86K$129K$172K$206K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$372K$558K$744K$892K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 59 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin6.3%-11.1%-0.5%7.7%
P68
Net-to-Gross32.9%18.1%25.7%32.9%
P74
Occupancy51.4%57.2%74.7%84.7%
P17
Rev/Bed$140K$538K$1.1M$1.8M
P2
Exp/Bed$131K$512K$1.1M$1.9M
P0

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML