Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE WILLOUGH AT NAPLES 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE WILLOUGH AT NAPLES
CCN 104063 | FL | 87 beds | Current EBITDA $620K → Pro Forma $1.2M (+$595K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$11.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$620K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$595K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$1.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+530bps
Margin Improvement
$430K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$595K
Modeled Uplift
$392K
Risk-Adjusted
-$203K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Occupancy RateOccupancy Rate has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$224K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$224K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$136K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$595K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$224K$224K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$216K$8K$224K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$34K$102K$136K$430K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$56K$112K$168K$224K$224K$224K$224K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$56K$112K$168K$224K$224K$224K$224K
A/R Days Reduction$0$45K$91K$136K$136K$136K$136K$136K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$162K$325K$482K$595K$595K$595K$595K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $595K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x65% / 12.2x69% / 14.0x73% / 15.7x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.4x
9.0x60% / 10.5x64% / 12.1x68% / 13.6x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x
10.0x56% / 9.1x60% / 10.5x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x
11.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.3x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x
12.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.2x
Headroom (turns)
34%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 34% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.3x, adding 4.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$620K$620K5.5%
Year 1$639K+$396K$1.0M9.2%
Year 2$658K+$595K$1.3M11.2%
Year 3$678K+$595K$1.3M11.3%
Year 4$698K+$595K$1.3M11.5%
Year 5$719K+$595K$1.3M11.7%
$6.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$14.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.2M
Value Created
$1.3M
Exit EBITDA
$988K
Organic Growth
$5.9M
RCM Value Creation
$1.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$112K$168K$224K$269K
Denial Rate Reductio$112K$168K$224K$269K
A/R Days Reduction$68K$102K$136K$164K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$297K$446K$595K$713K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 121 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.5%-8.8%2.8%12.0%
P57
Net-to-Gross44.9%14.0%20.7%37.5%
P81
Occupancy48.7%49.1%62.9%77.4%
P23
Rev/Bed$129K$304K$571K$1.2M
P8
Exp/Bed$122K$338K$624K$1.1M
P3

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML