Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAYHEALTH HOSPITAL SUSSEX CAMPUS 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAYHEALTH HOSPITAL SUSSEX CAMPUS
CCN 080009 | DE | 117 beds | Current EBITDA $-4.2M → Pro Forma $11.5M (+$15.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$298.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-4.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$15.7M
Modeled Uplift
$11.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.5M (vs $15.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$191K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.0M$6.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.7M$164K$5.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$916K$2.7M$3.6M$11.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$191K$191K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT39.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.4M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$96K$191K$191K$191K$191K$191K$191K
Cumulative$0$4.3M$8.6M$12.7M$15.7M$15.7M$15.7M$15.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-3.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
9.6x
Headroom (turns)
148%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 148% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -3.1x, adding 102.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-4.2M$-4.2M-1.4%
Year 1$-4.4M+$10.5M$6.1M2.0%
Year 2$-4.5M+$15.7M$11.2M3.8%
Year 3$-4.6M+$15.7M$11.1M3.7%
Year 4$-4.8M+$15.7M$10.9M3.7%
Year 5$-4.9M+$15.7M$10.8M3.6%
$-42.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$118.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$161.2M
Value Created
$10.8M
Exit EBITDA
$-6.7M
Organic Growth
$157.1M
RCM Value Creation
$10.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.4M$5.9M$7.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$96K$143K$191K$229K
Total$7.9M$11.8M$15.7M$18.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 9 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.4%-2.5%-0.9%7.7%
P33
Net-to-Gross36.5%33.3%36.5%42.0%
P44
Occupancy68.3%67.9%68.7%76.4%
P33
Rev/Bed$2.6M$254K$884K$2.6M
P67
Exp/Bed$2.6M$247K$906K$2.6M
P67

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML