Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTH COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTH COLORADO MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 060001 | CO | 202 beds | Current EBITDA $-42.2M → Pro Forma $-25.3M (+$16.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$321.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-42.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$16.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-25.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$16.9M
Modeled Uplift
$11.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.6M (vs $16.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$206K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$16.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.4M$6.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.2M$177K$6.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$988K$2.9M$3.9M$12.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$206K$206K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$103K$206K$206K$206K$206K$206K$206K
Cumulative$0$4.6M$9.2M$13.7M$16.9M$16.9M$16.9M$16.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $16.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-42.2M$-42.2M-13.1%
Year 1$-43.5M+$11.3M$-32.2M-10.0%
Year 2$-44.8M+$16.9M$-27.8M-8.7%
Year 3$-46.1M+$16.9M$-29.2M-9.1%
Year 4$-47.5M+$16.9M$-30.6M-9.5%
Year 5$-48.9M+$16.9M$-32.0M-9.9%
$-422.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-351.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$70.1M
Value Created
$-32.0M
Exit EBITDA
$-67.2M
Organic Growth
$169.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-32.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.6M
A/R Days Reduction$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$103K$154K$206K$247K
Total$8.5M$12.7M$16.9M$20.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 27 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-13.1%-9.8%1.3%11.3%
P11
Net-to-Gross31.3%17.0%19.4%28.8%
P85
Occupancy55.5%58.3%64.2%71.9%
P15
Rev/Bed$1.6M$1.4M$1.8M$2.2M
P33
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.4M$1.7M$2.0M
P52

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML