Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NEWPORT BAY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NEWPORT BAY HOSPITAL
CCN 054135 | CA | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $-197K → Pro Forma $369K (+$566K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$10.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-197K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$566K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$369K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+531bps
Margin Improvement
$409K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

71%
Realization (B)
$566K
Modeled Uplift
$402K
Risk-Adjusted
-$164K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 71% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$214K
+200bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$213K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$130K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+9bp
Total EBITDA Impact$566K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$205K$8K$214K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$213K$213K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$33K$97K$130K$409K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT47.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$53K$107K$160K$214K$214K$214K$214K
Cost to Collect$0$53K$107K$160K$213K$213K$213K$213K
A/R Days Reduction$0$43K$86K$130K$130K$130K$130K$130K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$155K$309K$459K$566K$566K$566K$566K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $566K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-4.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
11.0x
Headroom (turns)
170%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 170% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -4.5x, adding 103.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-197K$-197K-1.9%
Year 1$-203K+$377K$174K1.6%
Year 2$-209K+$566K$357K3.3%
Year 3$-216K+$566K$350K3.3%
Year 4$-222K+$566K$344K3.2%
Year 5$-229K+$566K$337K3.2%
$-2.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$3.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.7M
Value Created
$337K
Exit EBITDA
$-314K
Organic Growth
$5.7M
RCM Value Creation
$337K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$107K$160K$214K$256K
Cost to Collect$107K$160K$213K$256K
A/R Days Reduction$65K$97K$130K$156K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$283K$425K$566K$679K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 82 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.9%-18.6%-6.3%1.8%
P67
Net-to-Gross86.0%25.8%34.2%47.6%
P96
Occupancy67.0%35.1%53.8%71.0%
P70
Rev/Bed$296K$501K$1.4M$2.8M
P7
Exp/Bed$302K$671K$1.7M$3.1M
P4

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML