Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AURORA VISTA DEL MAR BHS 2026-04-26 17:20 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AURORA VISTA DEL MAR BHS
CCN 054077 | CA | 87 beds | Current EBITDA $-1.2M → Pro Forma $-455K (+$726K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$13.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-1.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$726K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-455K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$529K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$726K
Modeled Uplift
$452K
Risk-Adjusted
-$274K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$276K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$274K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$168K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$726K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$276K$276K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$265K$8K$274K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$42K$125K$168K$529K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT35.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$69K$138K$207K$276K$276K$276K$276K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$68K$137K$205K$274K$274K$274K$274K
A/R Days Reduction$0$56K$112K$168K$168K$168K$168K$168K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$198K$396K$589K$726K$726K$726K$726K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $726K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-1.2M$-1.2M-8.6%
Year 1$-1.2M+$484K$-733K-5.3%
Year 2$-1.3M+$726K$-527K-3.8%
Year 3$-1.3M+$726K$-565K-4.1%
Year 4$-1.3M+$726K$-603K-4.4%
Year 5$-1.4M+$726K$-643K-4.7%
$-11.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$-7.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$4.7M
Value Created
$-643K
Exit EBITDA
$-1.9M
Organic Growth
$7.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-643K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$138K$207K$276K$331K
Denial Rate Reductio$137K$205K$274K$328K
A/R Days Reduction$84K$126K$168K$201K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$363K$545K$726K$872K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 165 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-8.6%-19.5%-3.9%4.4%
P39
Net-to-Gross58.1%18.9%25.1%35.7%
P90
Occupancy39.3%43.7%57.0%74.6%
P20
Rev/Bed$158K$508K$962K$2.1M
P2
Exp/Bed$172K$597K$1.1M$2.3M
P1

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML