Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FOOTHILL REG MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 15:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FOOTHILL REG MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 050780 | CA | 111 beds | Current EBITDA $7.1M → Pro Forma $11.8M (+$4.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$88.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$4.7M
Modeled Uplift
$2.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.9M (vs $4.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$57K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.8M$1.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.7M$49K$1.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$272K$807K$1.1M$3.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$57K$57K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$443K$887K$1.3M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$439K$878K$1.3M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$360K$719K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$28K$57K$57K$57K$57K$57K$57K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M$4.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.5x67% / 13.0x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x
9.0x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.8x66% / 12.5x
10.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.7x60% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x
11.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
12.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.4x
Headroom (turns)
21%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 21% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.1x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.1M$7.1M8.0%
Year 1$7.3M+$3.1M$10.4M11.7%
Year 2$7.5M+$4.7M$12.2M13.7%
Year 3$7.8M+$4.7M$12.4M14.0%
Year 4$8.0M+$4.7M$12.6M14.3%
Year 5$8.2M+$4.7M$12.9M14.5%
$70.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$141.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$70.8M
Value Created
$12.9M
Exit EBITDA
$11.3M
Organic Growth
$46.6M
RCM Value Creation
$12.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$887K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$878K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$539K$809K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$28K$43K$57K$68K
Total$2.3M$3.5M$4.7M$5.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 180 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-20.8%-4.5%4.4%
P0
Net-to-Gross21.0%17.9%22.5%30.6%
P36
Occupancy32.1%44.6%59.1%72.5%
P13
Rev/Bed$799K$582K$1.0M$2.1M
P40
Exp/Bed$1.6M$639K$1.2M$2.3M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML