Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — JOHN MUIR MEDICAL CENTER - WC 2026-04-26 09:05 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — JOHN MUIR MEDICAL CENTER - WC
CCN 050180 | CA | 506 beds | Current EBITDA $47.2M → Pro Forma $104.7M (+$57.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$1.09B
Net Revenue HCRIS
$47.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$57.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$104.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$41.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$57.4M
Modeled Uplift
$38.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$19.2M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $38.2M (vs $57.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$21.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$21.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$13.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$699K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$57.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$21.8M$21.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$21.0M$601K$21.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$3.4M$9.9M$13.3M$41.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$699K$699K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT29.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$5.5M$10.9M$16.4M$21.8M$21.8M$21.8M$21.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$5.4M$10.8M$16.2M$21.6M$21.6M$21.6M$21.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$4.4M$8.9M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M$13.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$349K$699K$699K$699K$699K$699K$699K
Cumulative$0$15.6M$31.3M$46.6M$57.4M$57.4M$57.4M$57.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $57.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x70% / 14.1x74% / 16.1x78% / 18.0x80% / 18.9x82% / 19.9x
9.0x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.9x73% / 15.6x75% / 16.5x77% / 17.3x
10.0x60% / 10.7x65% / 12.2x69% / 13.7x71% / 14.5x73% / 15.3x
11.0x56% / 9.4x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x69% / 13.6x
12.0x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.6x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.7x
Headroom (turns)
41%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 41% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.8x, adding 4.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$47.2M$47.2M4.3%
Year 1$48.7M+$38.3M$87.0M8.0%
Year 2$50.1M+$57.4M$107.6M9.9%
Year 3$51.6M+$57.4M$109.1M10.0%
Year 4$53.2M+$57.4M$110.6M10.1%
Year 5$54.8M+$57.4M$112.2M10.3%
$472.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.23B
Exit EV (11x)
$761.9M
Value Created
$112.2M
Exit EBITDA
$75.3M
Organic Growth
$574.5M
RCM Value Creation
$112.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$10.9M$16.4M$21.8M$26.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$10.8M$16.2M$21.6M$25.9M
A/R Days Reduction$6.6M$10.0M$13.3M$15.9M
Clean Claim Rate$349K$524K$699K$839K
Total$28.7M$43.1M$57.4M$68.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 107 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.3%-13.9%-5.0%3.0%
P78
Net-to-Gross20.2%18.4%24.0%29.1%
P36
Occupancy57.8%57.6%68.6%77.6%
P25
Rev/Bed$2.2M$1.4M$1.9M$2.8M
P61
Exp/Bed$2.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.9M
P52

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML