Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — YUMA REHABILITATION HOSPITAL AN AFF 2026-04-26 09:53 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — YUMA REHABILITATION HOSPITAL AN AFF
CCN 033034 | AZ | 51 beds | Current EBITDA $2.7M → Pro Forma $3.3M (+$632K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$11.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$632K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+529bps
Margin Improvement
$458K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$632K
Modeled Uplift
$442K
Risk-Adjusted
-$190K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.4M (vs $0.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$239K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$238K
+199bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$145K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+8bp
Total EBITDA Impact$632K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$239K$239K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$230K$8K$238K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$37K$109K$145K$458K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$60K$119K$179K$239K$239K$239K$239K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$60K$119K$179K$238K$238K$238K$238K
A/R Days Reduction$0$48K$97K$145K$145K$145K$145K$145K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$173K$345K$513K$632K$632K$632K$632K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $632K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x
9.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
10.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x
11.0x33% / 4.2x38% / 5.0x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x
12.0x29% / 3.5x34% / 4.3x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.4x
Headroom (turns)
-6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.9x, adding 1.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.7M$2.7M22.7%
Year 1$2.8M+$421K$3.2M27.0%
Year 2$2.9M+$632K$3.5M29.4%
Year 3$3.0M+$632K$3.6M30.1%
Year 4$3.1M+$632K$3.7M30.9%
Year 5$3.1M+$632K$3.8M31.7%
$27.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$41.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.4M
Value Created
$3.8M
Exit EBITDA
$4.3M
Organic Growth
$6.3M
RCM Value Creation
$3.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$119K$179K$239K$287K
Denial Rate Reductio$119K$179K$238K$286K
A/R Days Reduction$73K$109K$145K$174K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$316K$474K$632K$758K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 45 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin22.7%-9.8%2.9%8.0%
P90
Net-to-Gross71.4%18.9%28.9%54.5%
P92
Occupancy65.9%33.6%54.0%74.1%
P64
Rev/Bed$234K$281K$449K$1.0M
P12
Exp/Bed$181K$319K$502K$1.4M
P2

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML