Market Analysis — DANVILLE STATE
PA market | 4 hospitals | HHI: nan (Competitive)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
← DashboardPRFProfileMEMIC MemoBRGBridgeCIComp IntelSCNScenariosAIMLDCFDCFLBOLBOFIN3-StmtMKTMarketDENDenialRETReturnsLVRLeversWFLWaterfallPLYPlaybookTRDTrendsPREDPredictedMEM2Memo
4
Hospitals in Market
758
Total Beds
$1.6B
Market Revenue
Competitive
HHI: nan
None
Moat Rating (3/10)
#4
Market Share Rank
Competitive Moat (Mauboussin Framework)
Based on "Measuring the Moat" adapted for healthcare. Score 0-10: wide (8+), narrow (5-7), none (<5).
Scale Advantageweak
Switching Costsmoderate
Market Share0.0%
Top 3 Concentrationnan%
Network Density0.53
Margin vs Market+25.6%
Bed Util vs Market+33.9%
What This Means
This hospital has a none moat — no moat — commoditized market position, pricing power limited. The PA market is competitive — many players, value creation must come from operations not market power (HHI: nan).
Implications: Operational improvements are the primary value driver — see the EBITDA bridge. Compare against peers via comparables or see the full PA market.
Top Competitors
| Hospital | Beds | Revenue | Rev Share | Bed Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GEISINGER MEDICAL CENTER | 525 | $1,583M | 98.3% | 69.3% |
| GEISINGER ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILIT | 42 | $17M | 1.1% | 5.5% |
| SSH - DANVILLE | 30 | $10M | 0.6% | 4.0% |
Regional Payer Mix
■ Medicare 32%■ Medicaid 8%■ Commercial 60%