Market Analysis — REHOBOTH MCKINLEY CHRISTIAN HOSPITAL
NM market | 4 hospitals | HHI: nan (Competitive)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
← DashboardPRFProfileMEMIC MemoBRGBridgeCIComp IntelSCNScenariosAIMLDCFDCFLBOLBOFIN3-StmtMKTMarketDENDenialRETReturnsLVRLeversWFLWaterfallPLYPlaybookTRDTrendsPREDPredictedMEM2Memo
4
Hospitals in Market
170
Total Beds
$0.0B
Market Revenue
Competitive
HHI: nan
Narrow
Moat Rating (5/10)
#1
Market Share Rank
Competitive Moat (Mauboussin Framework)
Based on "Measuring the Moat" adapted for healthcare. Score 0-10: wide (8+), narrow (5-7), none (<5).
Scale Advantagemoderate
Switching Costslow
Market Share100.0%
Top 3 Concentrationnan%
Network Density2.35
Margin vs Market+66.4%
Bed Util vs Market-25.1%
What This Means
This hospital has a narrow moat — narrow moat — some competitive advantages, but vulnerable to new entrants. The NM market is competitive — many players, value creation must come from operations not market power (HHI: nan).
Implications: Operational improvements are the primary value driver — see the EBITDA bridge. Compare against peers via comparables or see the full NM market.
Top Competitors
| Hospital | Beds | Revenue | Rev Share | Bed Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ZUNI COMPREHENSIVE HEALTH CENTER | 27 | $nanM | nan% | 15.9% |
| GALLUP INDIAN MEDICAL CENTER | 74 | $nanM | nan% | 43.5% |
| CROWNPOINT INDIAN HOSPITAL | 19 | $nanM | nan% | 11.2% |
Regional Payer Mix
■ Medicare 28%■ Medicaid 43%■ Commercial 30%