Market Analysis — OAKLAWN HOSPITAL
MI market | 3 hospitals | HHI: 4,957 (Concentrated)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
← DashboardPRFProfileMEMIC MemoBRGBridgeCIComp IntelSCNScenariosAIMLDCFDCFLBOLBOFIN3-StmtMKTMarketDENDenialRETReturnsLVRLeversWFLWaterfallPLYPlaybookTRDTrendsPREDPredictedMEM2Memo
3
Hospitals in Market
247
Total Beds
$0.4B
Market Revenue
Concentrated
HHI: 4,957
None
Moat Rating (2/10)
#2
Market Share Rank
Competitive Moat (Mauboussin Framework)
Based on "Measuring the Moat" adapted for healthcare. Score 0-10: wide (8+), narrow (5-7), none (<5).
Scale Advantageweak
Switching Costslow
Market Share37.1%
Top 3 Concentration100.0%
Network Density1.21
Margin vs Market-0.0%
Bed Util vs Market-25.6%
What This Means
This hospital has a none moat — no moat — commoditized market position, pricing power limited. The MI market is highly concentrated — few dominant players, potential antitrust concerns (HHI: 4,957).
Implications: Operational improvements are the primary value driver — see the EBITDA bridge. Compare against peers via comparables or see the full MI market.
Top Competitors
| Hospital | Beds | Revenue | Rev Share | Bed Share |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BRONSON BATTLE CREEK | 144 | $252M | 59.7% | 58.3% |
| SSH - KALAMAZOO | 25 | $13M | 3.1% | 10.1% |
Regional Payer Mix
■ Medicare 28%■ Medicaid 2%■ Commercial 70%