Corpus Intelligence ML Analysis — FREEMAN REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES 2026-04-26 04:10 UTC
ML Analysis — FREEMAN REGIONAL HEALTH SERVICES
CCN 431313 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.

Investability Score

Speculative — only pursue if turnaround thesis is strong and entry multiple reflects risk.

38
/ 100 (D)
Financial Health3/25
RCM Upside18/25
Market Position10/20
Demand Defensibility2/15
Operational Efficiency4/15
Entry Multiple: 6.0x – 8.5x
Est. MOIC: 1.5x
Risk Factors:
  • Negative operating margin
  • Heavy Medicare dependence (>55%)
  • Small facility (<50 beds) — limited scale
  • Low occupancy (<30%) — demand risk
  • Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
  • Limited competition supports pricing power

Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)

-7.0%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -7.4%

Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-35.3%, 21.3%]. P44 nationally.

DriverValueEffectExplanation
Revenue/Bed536620.760-0.1455
Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin
Expense/Bed576385.560+0.1331
Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin
Reimbursement Quality0.081+0.0346
Higher Reimbursement Quality increases predicted m
Net-to-Gross0.619+0.0281
Higher Net-to-Gross increases predicted margin
Bed Utilization Value60395.564-0.0270
Lower Bed Utilization Value decreases predicted ma
Turnaround: 38%Turnaround possible (38%) but uncertain. Margin improvement depends on improving Revenue/Bed.
Rural/Critical Access
Archetype
62.7%
Distress Risk
$6.1M
RCM Opportunity
A
Opportunity Grade
38.0%
Projected Margin

Cluster: Rural/Critical Access

Percentile within cluster: P78. Rural/small hospitals face structural headwinds. Evaluate CAH conversion, telehealth, and rural health funding.

Nearest Peers

HospitalStateBeds
BRECKINRIDGE HEALTH INCKY25
SHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOSPITALMT19
DAYTON GENERAL HOSPITALWA25
BLUE MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL DISTRICTOR16
COMMUNITY HOSPITALWY25
CARLE EUREKA HOSPITALIL25

Distress Analysis

Risk: High
National distress rate: 49.3%
SD distress rate: 44.8%
Model AUC: 0.629
FactorValueContributionDirection
Occupancy Rate0.113+0.383▲ risk
Net To Gross Ratio0.619+0.112▲ risk
Medicare Day Pct0.866+0.092▲ risk
Medicaid Day Pct0.003-0.086▼ risk
Revenue Per Bed536620.760+0.062▲ risk
Beds25.000-0.017▼ risk

RCM Improvement Opportunity

Total (risk-adjusted): $6.1M
Current margin: -7.4%
Projected margin: 38.0%
Grade: A
Comps: 42

Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.

LeverCurrentBenchmarkGapImpactConfidenceTimeline
Payer Mix Optimization0.1310.40627.5%$4.1M50%24mo
Occupancy Improvement0.1130.41029.8%$2.0M55%24mo

Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)

A
RCM Grade

Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.

MetricPredicted90% CIPercentileAssessment
Denial Rate2.0%[2.0%, 25.0%]P0Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall
Days in AR32.3[25.0, 75.0]P71Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally
Clean Claim Rate98.0%[80.0%, 98.0%]P0Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third.
Net Collection Rate99.5%[90.0%, 99.5%]P8Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third.