Corpus Intelligence ML Analysis — NELSON COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEM-HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 19:27 UTC
ML Analysis — NELSON COUNTY HEALTH SYSTEM-HOSPITAL
CCN 351308 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.

Investability Score

Speculative — only pursue if turnaround thesis is strong and entry multiple reflects risk.

39
/ 100 (D)
Financial Health4/25
RCM Upside18/25
Market Position11/20
Demand Defensibility1/15
Operational Efficiency4/15
Entry Multiple: 6.0x – 8.5x
Est. MOIC: 1.5x
Risk Factors:
  • Negative operating margin
  • Heavy Medicare dependence (>55%)
  • Small facility (<50 beds) — limited scale
  • Low occupancy (<30%) — demand risk
  • Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
  • Limited competition supports pricing power

Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)

-13.0%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -24.9%

Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-41.3%, 15.3%]. P31 nationally.

DriverValueEffectExplanation
Revenue/Bed376635.579-0.1679
Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin
Expense/Bed470453.684+0.1462
Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin
Net-to-Gross1.000+0.0708
Higher Net-to-Gross increases predicted margin
State Peer Margin-0.093-0.0351
Lower State Peer Margin decreases predicted margin
Log(Beds)2.944-0.0332
Lower Log(Beds) decreases predicted margin
Turnaround: 28%Low turnaround probability (28%). Structural disadvantages in Revenue/Bed and Expense/Bed.
Rural/Critical Access
Archetype
67.4%
Distress Risk
$7.0M
RCM Opportunity
A
Opportunity Grade
72.5%
Projected Margin

Cluster: Rural/Critical Access

Percentile within cluster: P74. Rural/small hospitals face structural headwinds. Evaluate CAH conversion, telehealth, and rural health funding.

Nearest Peers

HospitalStateBeds
BRECKINRIDGE HEALTH INCKY25
SHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOSPITALMT19
DAYTON GENERAL HOSPITALWA25
BLUE MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL DISTRICTOR16
COMMUNITY HOSPITALWY25
CARLE EUREKA HOSPITALIL25

Distress Analysis

Risk: High
National distress rate: 49.3%
ND distress rate: 69.4%
Model AUC: 0.629
FactorValueContributionDirection
Occupancy Rate0.068+0.424▲ risk
Net To Gross Ratio1.000+0.281▲ risk
Medicaid Day Pct0.006-0.082▼ risk
Medicare Day Pct0.771+0.076▲ risk
Revenue Per Bed376635.579+0.071▲ risk
Beds19.000-0.017▼ risk

RCM Improvement Opportunity

Total (risk-adjusted): $7.0M
Current margin: -24.9%
Projected margin: 72.5%
Grade: A
Comps: 38

Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.

LeverCurrentBenchmarkGapImpactConfidenceTimeline
Payer Mix Optimization0.2230.52630.2%$4.5M50%24mo
Occupancy Improvement0.0680.43836.9%$2.4M55%24mo

Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)

A
RCM Grade

Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.

MetricPredicted90% CIPercentileAssessment
Denial Rate2.0%[2.0%, 25.0%]P0Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall
Days in AR30.0[25.0, 75.0]P58Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally
Clean Claim Rate98.0%[80.0%, 98.0%]P0Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third.
Net Collection Rate99.5%[90.0%, 99.5%]P8Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third.