Corpus Intelligence ML Analysis — PEARL RIVER COUNTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:33 UTC
ML Analysis — PEARL RIVER COUNTY HOSPITAL
CCN 251333 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.

Investability Score

Speculative — only pursue if turnaround thesis is strong and entry multiple reflects risk.

40
/ 100 (D)
Financial Health5/25
RCM Upside19/25
Market Position9/20
Demand Defensibility3/15
Operational Efficiency4/15
Entry Multiple: 6.0x – 8.5x
Est. MOIC: 1.5x
Risk Factors:
  • Negative operating margin
  • Heavy Medicare dependence (>55%)
  • Small facility (<50 beds) — limited scale
  • Low occupancy (<30%) — demand risk
  • Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
  • Limited competition supports pricing power

Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)

-10.1%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -14.0%

Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-38.4%, 18.2%]. P37 nationally.

DriverValueEffectExplanation
Revenue/Bed766950.208-0.1134
Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin
Expense/Bed874281.042+0.0964
Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin
State Peer Margin-0.125-0.0591
Lower State Peer Margin decreases predicted margin
Reimbursement Quality0.026+0.0504
Higher Reimbursement Quality increases predicted m
Net-to-Gross0.697+0.0368
Higher Net-to-Gross increases predicted margin
Turnaround: 33%Turnaround possible (33%) but uncertain. Margin improvement depends on improving Revenue/Bed.
Rural/Critical Access
Archetype
60.4%
Distress Risk
$8.0M
RCM Opportunity
A
Opportunity Grade
29.7%
Projected Margin

Cluster: Rural/Critical Access

Percentile within cluster: P88. Rural/small hospitals face structural headwinds. Evaluate CAH conversion, telehealth, and rural health funding.

Nearest Peers

HospitalStateBeds
BRECKINRIDGE HEALTH INCKY25
SHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOSPITALMT19
DAYTON GENERAL HOSPITALWA25
BLUE MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL DISTRICTOR16
COMMUNITY HOSPITALWY25
CARLE EUREKA HOSPITALIL25

Distress Analysis

Risk: High
National distress rate: 49.3%
MS distress rate: 68.2%
Model AUC: 0.629
FactorValueContributionDirection
Occupancy Rate0.256+0.250▲ risk
Net To Gross Ratio0.697+0.146▲ risk
Medicare Day Pct0.960+0.109▲ risk
Medicaid Day Pct0.002-0.087▼ risk
Revenue Per Bed766950.208+0.048▲ risk
Beds24.000-0.017▼ risk

RCM Improvement Opportunity

Total (risk-adjusted): $8.0M
Current margin: -14.0%
Projected margin: 29.7%
Grade: A
Comps: 62

Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.

LeverCurrentBenchmarkGapImpactConfidenceTimeline
Payer Mix Optimization0.0380.46442.6%$6.4M50%24mo
Occupancy Improvement0.2560.50625.0%$1.6M55%24mo

Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)

A
RCM Grade

Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.

MetricPredicted90% CIPercentileAssessment
Denial Rate2.0%[2.0%, 25.0%]P0Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall
Days in AR33.5[25.0, 75.0]P75Average — predicted days in ar is near the median.
Clean Claim Rate98.0%[80.0%, 98.0%]P0Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third.
Net Collection Rate99.5%[90.0%, 99.5%]P8Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third.