Corpus Intelligence ML Analysis — BOLIVAR MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 03:45 UTC
ML Analysis — BOLIVAR MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 250093 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.

Investability Score

Speculative — only pursue if turnaround thesis is strong and entry multiple reflects risk.

44
/ 100 (D)
Financial Health2/25
RCM Upside18/25
Market Position15/20
Demand Defensibility9/15
Operational Efficiency0/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
  • Negative operating margin
  • Low occupancy (<30%) — demand risk
  • Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
  • RCM optimization could add 3-5pp margin
  • Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
  • Limited competition supports pricing power
  • Volume growth opportunity from low occupancy

Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)

-16.7%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -10.9%

Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-45.0%, 11.6%]. P25 nationally.

DriverValueEffectExplanation
Revenue/Bed345414.928-0.1722
Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin
Expense/Bed383038.085+0.1570
Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin
State Peer Margin-0.125-0.0591
Lower State Peer Margin decreases predicted margin
Reimbursement Quality0.071+0.0376
Higher Reimbursement Quality increases predicted m
Bed Utilization Value64388.630-0.0268
Lower Bed Utilization Value decreases predicted ma
Turnaround: 24%Low turnaround probability (24%). Structural disadvantages in Revenue/Bed and Expense/Bed.
Rural/Critical Access
Archetype
56.3%
Distress Risk
$4.1M
RCM Opportunity
C
Opportunity Grade
-3.1%
Projected Margin

Cluster: Rural/Critical Access

Percentile within cluster: P60. Rural/small hospitals face structural headwinds. Evaluate CAH conversion, telehealth, and rural health funding.

Nearest Peers

HospitalStateBeds
BRECKINRIDGE HEALTH INCKY25
SHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOSPITALMT19
DAYTON GENERAL HOSPITALWA25
BLUE MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL DISTRICTOR16
COMMUNITY HOSPITALWY25
CARLE EUREKA HOSPITALIL25

Distress Analysis

Risk: High
National distress rate: 49.3%
MS distress rate: 68.2%
Model AUC: 0.629
FactorValueContributionDirection
Occupancy Rate0.186+0.314▲ risk
Net To Gross Ratio0.144-0.100▼ risk
Revenue Per Bed345414.928+0.073▲ risk
Medicaid Day Pct0.060-0.029▼ risk
Medicare Day Pct0.450+0.021▲ risk
Beds152.000+0.000▲ risk

RCM Improvement Opportunity

Total (risk-adjusted): $4.1M
Current margin: -10.9%
Projected margin: -3.1%
Grade: C
Comps: 29

Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.

LeverCurrentBenchmarkGapImpactConfidenceTimeline
Occupancy Improvement0.1860.55136.4%$2.4M55%24mo
Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement0.1440.30516.1%$989K65%18mo
Payer Mix Optimization0.4900.5384.8%$714K50%24mo

Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)

A
RCM Grade

Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.

MetricPredicted90% CIPercentileAssessment
Denial Rate2.0%[2.0%, 25.0%]P0Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall
Days in AR29.5[25.0, 75.0]P55Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally
Clean Claim Rate98.0%[80.0%, 98.0%]P0Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third.
Net Collection Rate99.5%[90.0%, 99.5%]P8Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third.