Corpus Intelligence ML Analysis — LA EXTENDED CARE OF NATCHITOCHES 2026-04-26 16:03 UTC
ML Analysis — LA EXTENDED CARE OF NATCHITOCHES
CCN 192035 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.

Investability Score

Hold / Selective — investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.

45
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health8/25
RCM Upside15/25
Market Position11/20
Demand Defensibility6/15
Operational Efficiency5/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
  • Heavy Medicare dependence (>55%)
  • Small facility (<50 beds) — limited scale
Catalysts:
  • Limited competition supports pricing power

Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)

-6.3%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: 0.4%

Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-34.6%, 22.0%]. P46 nationally.

DriverValueEffectExplanation
Revenue/Bed678738.556-0.1257
Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin
Expense/Bed676091.333+0.1209
Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin
Log(Beds)2.197-0.0506
Lower Log(Beds) decreases predicted margin
Reimbursement Quality0.093+0.0312
Higher Reimbursement Quality increases predicted m
Bed Count9.000+0.0218
Higher Bed Count increases predicted margin
Rural/Critical Access
Archetype
49.8%
Distress Risk
$8.4M
RCM Opportunity
A
Opportunity Grade
137.2%
Projected Margin

Cluster: Rural/Critical Access

Percentile within cluster: P89. Rural/small hospitals face structural headwinds. Evaluate CAH conversion, telehealth, and rural health funding.

Nearest Peers

HospitalStateBeds
BRECKINRIDGE HEALTH INCKY25
SHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOSPITALMT19
DAYTON GENERAL HOSPITALWA25
BLUE MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL DISTRICTOR16
COMMUNITY HOSPITALWY25
CARLE EUREKA HOSPITALIL25

Distress Analysis

Risk: Elevated
National distress rate: 49.3%
LA distress rate: 46.3%
Model AUC: 0.629
FactorValueContributionDirection
Occupancy Rate0.687-0.150▼ risk
Medicare Day Pct0.650+0.055▲ risk
Revenue Per Bed678738.556+0.053▲ risk
Medicaid Day Pct0.138+0.049▲ risk
Net To Gross Ratio0.438+0.031▲ risk
Beds9.000-0.019▼ risk

RCM Improvement Opportunity

Total (risk-adjusted): $8.4M
Current margin: 0.4%
Projected margin: 137.2%
Grade: A
Comps: 25

Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.

LeverCurrentBenchmarkGapImpactConfidenceTimeline
Payer Mix Optimization0.2120.73252.0%$7.8M50%24mo
Occupancy Improvement0.6870.7566.9%$457K55%24mo
Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement0.4380.57914.0%$100K65%18mo

Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)

A
RCM Grade

Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.

MetricPredicted90% CIPercentileAssessment
Denial Rate2.0%[2.0%, 25.0%]P0Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall
Days in AR33.5[25.0, 75.0]P75Average — predicted days in ar is near the median.
Clean Claim Rate98.0%[80.0%, 98.0%]P0Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third.
Net Collection Rate99.3%[90.0%, 99.5%]P5Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third.