Corpus Intelligence ML Analysis — HARRISBURG MEDICAL CENTER INC. 2026-04-26 10:07 UTC
ML Analysis — HARRISBURG MEDICAL CENTER INC.
CCN 140210 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.

Investability Score

Hold / Selective — investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.

48
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health2/25
RCM Upside18/25
Market Position15/20
Demand Defensibility6/15
Operational Efficiency6/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
  • Negative operating margin
  • Small facility (<50 beds) — limited scale
  • Low occupancy (<30%) — demand risk
  • Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
  • Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
  • Limited competition supports pricing power

Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)

-12.9%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -13.8%

Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-41.2%, 15.4%]. P31 nationally.

DriverValueEffectExplanation
Revenue/Bed1232210.125-0.0484
Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin
Expense/Bed1402155.600+0.0314
Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin
Bed Utilization Value163985.224-0.0235
Lower Bed Utilization Value decreases predicted ma
Occupancy0.133-0.0223
Lower Occupancy decreases predicted margin
Bed Count40.000+0.0170
Higher Bed Count increases predicted margin
Turnaround: 29%Low turnaround probability (29%). Structural disadvantages in Revenue/Bed and Expense/Bed.
Rural/Critical Access
Archetype
57.6%
Distress Risk
$2.8M
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
-8.2%
Projected Margin

Cluster: Rural/Critical Access

Percentile within cluster: P37. Rural/small hospitals face structural headwinds. Evaluate CAH conversion, telehealth, and rural health funding.

Nearest Peers

HospitalStateBeds
BRECKINRIDGE HEALTH INCKY25
SHERIDAN MEMORIAL HOSPITALMT19
DAYTON GENERAL HOSPITALWA25
BLUE MOUNTAIN HOSPITAL DISTRICTOR16
COMMUNITY HOSPITALWY25
CARLE EUREKA HOSPITALIL25

Distress Analysis

Risk: High
National distress rate: 49.3%
IL distress rate: 51.0%
Model AUC: 0.629
FactorValueContributionDirection
Occupancy Rate0.133+0.364▲ risk
Medicaid Day Pct0.014-0.075▼ risk
Medicare Day Pct0.479+0.026▲ risk
Revenue Per Bed1232210.125+0.020▲ risk
Beds40.000-0.015▼ risk
Net To Gross Ratio0.400+0.014▲ risk

RCM Improvement Opportunity

Total (risk-adjusted): $2.8M
Current margin: -13.8%
Projected margin: -8.2%
Grade: D
Comps: 76

Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.

LeverCurrentBenchmarkGapImpactConfidenceTimeline
Occupancy Improvement0.1330.42629.3%$1.9M55%24mo
Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement0.4000.50810.8%$626K65%18mo
Payer Mix Optimization0.5070.5211.4%$203K50%24mo

Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)

A
RCM Grade

Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.

MetricPredicted90% CIPercentileAssessment
Denial Rate2.0%[2.0%, 25.0%]P0Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall
Days in AR31.4[25.0, 75.0]P67Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally
Clean Claim Rate98.0%[80.0%, 98.0%]P0Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third.
Net Collection Rate99.5%[90.0%, 99.5%]P8Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third.