ML Analysis — HAMILTON MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 110001 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Buy — solid fundamentals with identifiable value creation levers. Proceed to detailed diligence.
60
/ 100 (B)
Financial Health15/25
RCM Upside11/25
Market Position15/20
Demand Defensibility14/15
Operational Efficiency5/15
Entry Multiple: 9.5x – 11.5x
Est. MOIC: 2.3x
Risk Factors:
Catalysts:
- Strong commercial payer base protects revenue
- Limited competition supports pricing power
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
-1.4%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: 5.3%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-29.7%, 26.9%]. P59 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Log(Beds) | 5.398 | +0.0238 | Higher Log(Beds) increases predicted margin | |
| Expense/Bed | 1498686.181 | +0.0195 | Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Reimbursement Quality | 0.142 | +0.0170 | Higher Reimbursement Quality increases predicted m | |
| Net-to-Gross | 0.235 | -0.0150 | Lower Net-to-Gross decreases predicted margin | |
| State Peer Margin | -0.028 | +0.0130 | Higher State Peer Margin increases predicted margi |
Suburban Community Hospit
Archetype
46.9%
Distress Risk
$6.4M
RCM Opportunity
D
Opportunity Grade
7.1%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Suburban Community Hospital
Percentile within cluster: P14. Community hospitals — the largest PE deal category. Focus on RCM improvement and cost optimization at 9-11x.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| CLARA MAASS MEDICAL CENTER | NJ | 259 |
| PRESENCE SAINTS MARY & ELIZABETH MED | IL | 266 |
| ADVENTIST HEALTH BAKERSFIELD | CA | 254 |
| BRISTOL REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | TN | 244 |
| HOLSTON VALLEY HOSP & MED CTR | TN | 286 |
| SPRINGFIELD REGIONAL MEDICAL CENTER | OH | 230 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: Elevated
National distress rate: 49.3%
GA distress rate: 44.4%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.235 | -0.060 | ▼ risk |
| Occupancy Rate | 0.569 | -0.041 | ▼ risk |
| Beds | 221.000 | +0.010 | ▲ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.306 | -0.004 | ▼ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.088 | -0.001 | ▼ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 1582012.303 | -0.000 | ▼ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $6.4M
Current margin: 5.3%
Projected margin: 7.1%
Grade: D
Comps: 50
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payer Mix Optimization | 0.607 | 0.777 | 17.1% | $2.6M | 50% | 24mo |
| Occupancy Improvement | 0.569 | 0.869 | 30.0% | $2.0M | 55% | 24mo |
| Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement | 0.235 | 0.281 | 4.6% | $1.9M | 65% | 18mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 25.0 | [25.0, 75.0] | P0 | Strong — predicted days in ar is in the top third nationally |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |