ML Analysis — SSH - PENSACOLA INC
CCN 102024 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Speculative — only pursue if turnaround thesis is strong and entry multiple reflects risk.
45
/ 100 (D)
Financial Health5/25
RCM Upside20/25
Market Position8/20
Demand Defensibility12/15
Operational Efficiency0/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
- Negative operating margin
- Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
-0.1%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -17.4%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-28.4%, 28.2%]. P62 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue/Bed | 425514.107 | -0.1611 | Lower Revenue/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| Expense/Bed | 499519.613 | +0.1426 | Higher Expense/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| State Peer Margin | 0.032 | +0.0578 | Higher State Peer Margin increases predicted margi | |
| Reimbursement Quality | 0.080 | +0.0350 | Higher Reimbursement Quality increases predicted m | |
| Net-to-Gross | 0.146 | -0.0250 | Lower Net-to-Gross decreases predicted margin |
Turnaround: 50%Turnaround possible (50%) but uncertain. Margin improvement depends on improving Revenue/Bed.
nan%
Distress Risk
$3.5M
RCM Opportunity
B
Opportunity Grade
-6.5%
Projected Margin
Distress Analysis
Risk: Unknown
National distress rate: 49.3%
FL distress rate: 30.3%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Rate | 0.776 | -0.233 | ▼ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.452 | +0.021 | ▲ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | nan | +nan | ▼ risk |
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.146 | -0.099 | ▼ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 425514.107 | +0.068 | ▲ risk |
| Beds | 75.000 | -0.010 | ▼ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $3.5M
Current margin: -17.4%
Projected margin: -6.5%
Grade: B
Comps: 120
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payer Mix Optimization | 0.548 | 0.719 | 17.1% | $2.6M | 50% | 24mo |
| Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement | 0.146 | 0.388 | 24.2% | $904K | 65% | 18mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
B
RCM Grade
Average RCM profile — some improvement opportunities. Standard diligence scope recommended.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 25.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P83 | Below average — denial rate suggests RCM improvement opportu |
| Days in AR | 75.0 | [25.0, 75.0] | P83 | Below average — days in ar suggests RCM improvement opportun |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P8 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |