ML Analysis — HEALDSBURG HOSPITAL
CCN 051321 | Clustering + Distress + RCM Opportunity
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investability Score
Hold / Selective — investigate specific opportunities but be prepared for execution risk.
51
/ 100 (C)
Financial Health6/25
RCM Upside19/25
Market Position11/20
Demand Defensibility7/15
Operational Efficiency8/15
Entry Multiple: 8.0x – 10.0x
Est. MOIC: 1.9x
Risk Factors:
- Negative operating margin
- Small facility (<50 beds) — limited scale
- Expenses exceed revenue
Catalysts:
Margin Prediction (Trained Ridge Model)
-12.8%
R²=0.34 | n=4,907 | Grade B | Actual: -21.2%
Ridge regression trained on 4,907 HCRIS hospitals. 90% CI: [-41.1%, 15.5%]. P31 nationally.
| Driver | Value | Effect | Explanation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expense/Bed | 2883318.160 | -0.1510 | Higher Expense/Bed decreases predicted margin | |
| Revenue/Bed | 2379193.680 | +0.1117 | Higher Revenue/Bed increases predicted margin | |
| Log(Beds) | 3.219 | -0.0268 | Lower Log(Beds) decreases predicted margin | |
| Bed Count | 25.000 | +0.0193 | Higher Bed Count increases predicted margin | |
| Reimbursement Quality | 0.138 | +0.0182 | Higher Reimbursement Quality increases predicted m |
Turnaround: 29%Low turnaround probability (29%). Structural disadvantages in Expense/Bed and Revenue/Bed.
Under-Performing / Distre
Archetype
56.2%
Distress Risk
$8.4M
RCM Opportunity
A
Opportunity Grade
-7.0%
Projected Margin
Cluster: Under-Performing / Distressed
Percentile within cluster: P80. Deeply negative margins signal severe distress. Evaluate asset-level acquisition at 4-6x normalized EBITDA.
Nearest Peers
| Hospital | State | Beds |
|---|---|---|
| HOLY FAMILY MEMORIAL INC | WI | 58 |
| MIDDLESBORO ARH | KY | 46 |
| ATRIUM HEALTH NAVICENT BALDWIN | GA | 86 |
| BON SECOURS COMMUNITY HOSPITAL | NY | 98 |
| ADVANCED SPECIALTY HOSP. OF TOLEDO | OH | 40 |
| COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER BRANCH | MI | 75 |
Distress Analysis
Risk: High
National distress rate: 49.3%
CA distress rate: 49.7%
Model AUC: 0.629
| Factor | Value | Contribution | Direction |
|---|---|---|---|
| Occupancy Rate | 0.352 | +0.161 | ▲ risk |
| Medicaid Day Pct | 0.225 | +0.136 | ▲ risk |
| Revenue Per Bed | 2379193.680 | -0.047 | ▼ risk |
| Net To Gross Ratio | 0.423 | +0.024 | ▲ risk |
| Medicare Day Pct | 0.448 | +0.021 | ▲ risk |
| Beds | 25.000 | -0.017 | ▼ risk |
RCM Improvement Opportunity
Total (risk-adjusted): $8.4M
Current margin: -21.2%
Projected margin: -7.0%
Grade: A
Comps: 71
Gap analysis vs P75 peers with 60% closure assumption. Confidence-weighted by lever implementation difficulty.
| Lever | Current | Benchmark | Gap | Impact | Confidence | Timeline |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payer Mix Optimization | 0.326 | 0.653 | 32.6% | $4.9M | 50% | 24mo |
| Occupancy Improvement | 0.352 | 0.687 | 33.5% | $2.2M | 55% | 24mo |
| Net-to-Gross Ratio Improvement | 0.423 | 0.614 | 19.1% | $1.3M | 65% | 18mo |
Predicted RCM Performance (Public Data Only)
A
RCM Grade
Strong RCM profile — likely low-risk from an operations perspective. Focus diligence on growth thesis.
| Metric | Predicted | 90% CI | Percentile | Assessment |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denial Rate | 2.0% | [2.0%, 25.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted denial rate is in the top third nationall |
| Days in AR | 33.4 | [25.0, 75.0] | P75 | Average — predicted days in ar is near the median. |
| Clean Claim Rate | 98.0% | [80.0%, 98.0%] | P0 | Strong — predicted clean claim rate is in the top third. |
| Net Collection Rate | 99.5% | [90.0%, 99.5%] | P7 | Strong — predicted net collection rate is in the top third. |