Corpus Intelligence IC Memo — BEAVER VALLEY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:55 UTC
IC Memo — BEAVER VALLEY HOSPITAL
Investment Committee Memorandum | UT | 25 beds | Grade C | EBITDA uplift $811K
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
Investment Committee Memorandum

BEAVER VALLEY HOSPITAL

CCN 461335 | BEAVER, UT | 25 beds | April 26, 2026
EBITDA BridgeData Room
C
Investability

1. Target Overview & Investment Thesis

BEAVER VALLEY HOSPITAL is a 25-bed safety-net/medicaid heavy in BEAVER, UT with $10.9M in net patient revenue and a -100.0% operating margin. The hospital serves a payer mix of 9.6% Medicare, 55.6% Medicaid, and 34.8% commercial.

Thesis: Turnaround. Our ML models identify $811K in annual EBITDA improvement potential from RCM optimization across 5 levers, lifting margin from -100.0% to -99.3% (+740bps).

Net Revenue HCRIS$10.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED$-11.7M
Operating Margin COMPUTED-100.0%
Occupancy HCRIS38.9%
Revenue / Bed COMPUTED$438K
Net-to-Gross HCRIS73.6%
Distress Probability ML67.7%

2. Market Context & Competitive Position

59
UT Hospitals
8.0%
State Median Margin
28
Comparable Hospitals

UT has 59 Medicare-certified hospitals with a median operating margin of 8.0%. The target's margin of -100.0% places it below the state median. Among 28 size-comparable peers (12-50 beds), the median margin is 4.8%. The target's below-peer margin suggests operational improvement opportunity.

3. RCM Performance Analysis — Comparable Hospitals

Comps selected by bed count (12-50), prioritizing same-state peers. 28 hospitals in the comp set.

HospitalStateBedsRevenueMargin
BEAVER VALLEY HOSPITAL (Target)UT25$10.9M-100.0%
CEDAR CITY HOSPITALUT48$136.8M31.4%
GUNNISON VALLEY HOSPITALUT25$130.4M-6.4%
LAYTON HOSPITALUT37$121.1M9.5%
PARK CITY HOSPITALUT37$120.8M13.7%
UINTAH BASIN MEDICAL CENTERUT33$119.9M1.8%
MOUNTAIN WEST MEDICAL CENTERUT36$96.1M38.5%
THE ORTHOPEDIC SPECIALTY HOSPIUT40$88.7M12.4%
CASTLEVIEW HOSPITALUT39$84.5M21.5%

4. Predicted Improvement Opportunities

Improvement targets set at P75 of comparable peers with 60% gap closure assumption. Coefficients calibrated to published research bands. Total EBITDA uplift: $811K (740bps margin improvement).

LeverCurrentTargetEBITDA ImpactMarginRamp
Net Collection Rate93.5%97.0%$230K+210bp18mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0%6.5%$219K+200bp12mo
Cost to Collect4.5%2.5%$219K+200bp12mo
A/R Days Reduction5200.0%3800.0%$133K+122bp9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0%96.0%$10K+9bp6mo

5. EBITDA Bridge

Net Collection Rate
$230K
Denial Rate Reduction
$219K
Cost to Collect
$219K
A/R Days Reduction
$133K
Clean Claim Rate
$10K
Total EBITDA Uplift$811K
Current EBITDA$-11.7M
+ RCM Uplift+$811K
Pro Forma EBITDA$-10.9M
Current Margin-100.0%
Pro Forma Margin-99.3%
WC Released (1x)$420K

6. Returns Analysis — Scenario Matrix

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Base case uses 100% of predicted RCM uplift. Bull case: 130% uplift at lower entry. Bear case: 50% uplift at higher entry.

ScenarioEntryExitEquity InEquity OutMOICIRR
Base Case10.0x10.0x$-18.0M$-68.9M0.00x-100.0%
Base (11x exit)10.0x11.0x$-18.0M$-81.7M0.00x-100.0%
Bull Case9.0x11.0x$-16.2M$-84.8M0.00x-100.0%
Bull (12x exit)9.0x12.0x$-16.2M$-97.3M0.00x-100.0%
Bear Case11.0x10.0x$-19.8M$-67.1M0.00x-100.0%
Bear (11x exit)11.0x11.0x$-19.8M$-80.3M0.00x-100.0%

7. Key Risks & Mitigants

SeverityRisk FactorMitigant
HighNegative operating marginRCM uplift bridge shows clear path to profitability; working capital release provides near-term cash cushion
MediumElevated Medicaid exposure (55.6%)Medicaid reimburses below cost in most states. Mitigant: denial reduction lever has highest impact on Medicaid claims
HighElevated distress probabilityModel estimates 67.7% probability of financial distress. Mitigant: distressed entry pricing (7-9x) compensates for risk

8. Data Sources & Methodology Appendix

Data Sources

  • CMS HCRIS Cost Reports (Medicare-certified hospitals)
  • CMS Medicare Utilization (DRG-level volumes)
  • CMS Chronic Conditions (county-level disease prevalence)
  • HCRIS multi-year trend data (financial time series)

Comparable Selection

  • 28 hospitals with 12-50 beds
  • Same-state prioritization (n=29)
  • Comp margins: P25=-6.8% / P50=4.8% / P75=12.7%

Bridge Methodology

  • Targets: P75 of comparable peers (60% gap closure)
  • Denial: avoidable share = 35% of delta × NPR
  • AR: bad debt coefficient = $0.65 per day per $1K NPR
  • NCR: 60% coefficient on collection rate improvement
  • CDI: 0.75% of Medicare revenue per 0.01 CMI point

Returns Assumptions

  • Leverage: 5.5x entry (84.6% debt / 15.4% equity)
  • Organic growth: 3% annual EBITDA growth
  • Debt paydown: 10% of principal per year
  • Hold period: 5 years

Generated by SeekingChartis on April 26, 2026. All predictions use public data only. Confidence intervals calibrated via split conformal prediction (90% coverage target). This memo is for informational purposes and does not constitute investment advice.